Sorry Roberto - I definitely DO NOT work for the PGDB - but we have employed over 30 apprentices and trained them through to registration. I have seen all sorts of attitudes and abilities - but in the end a good attitude will mean that those around you want to teach you what they know. In a larger firm it is much easier as you rotate apprentices around different tradesmen so that by the end of the four years they will have been exposed to a number of different ways of doing things and then can make up their own mind what works. You are not only as good as the person that trained you - in this day and age with the internet and the ability to read, you can learn a lot on your own - you may not have physically "done" the job - but you can read and learn, read and learn. There are ample trade shows and seminars etc at merchants which are usually out of work hours - you can also attend these. I see a lot of bitterness on here from time to time about useless employers etc, and I admit that some of the examples given do seem poor practice. Taking on an apprentice is always a risk, and for a one man band, a huge risk, but generally most of these guys really do want to share what they have learned and take a lot of pride in an apprentice that does well.
The competencies and the legislation that underpins them is important for apprentices to know. The Federation have been on at the PGDB about the competencies being gazetted, because up until now we have all been working on transitional arrangements. Apprentices and tradesmen alike all have a vested interest in understanding what they are being measured against for registration, but also for the issue of arguements around CPD and perhaps, worse case scenario a disciplinary issue.