You'll notice that the receipt for the exploding hose has come from a binder....its the binder from the evidence bundle from my kangaroo court, sorry " hearing ".......which is ironic because no one was " listening "........dodgy as....

Here's a funny one here is the Boards response to my queries about a certain brand of pizza, I made this after old Maurice Williamson said in Parliament that there was an explosion, the poor guy got his wires crossed with the "pizza oven with held cert" and a very good purveyor of fine pizza, he had to retract it......then he got bollocked for sticking up for a guy who beat up his missis and mother in law......you couldn't make this shit up......

Does this smell of corruption to anyone?

Now bear in mind that this was written just months after the explosion in 2009.......BEFORE  I found all this other blatant PROOF and EVIDENCE........


So what changed......except it is now in HIS portfolio......funny that!

the Board's credibility is about as strong as the roof on the chipshop just after the explosion....



How do you all feel about getting told by these goons that it is YOU that needs upskilling......and you got to chip in to their charity to fund them to treat us like this.......it could be anyone of you.

Is any of this reasonable?


How would you feel about it.....I lost my home and business and two years with my two lads.......I had to work away while my wife lived in a caravan and had to collect drinking water and empty a chemical toilet......while ironically her husband was working away fitting toilets and taps in other peoples homes.....is this reasonable?

Heres the transcript of the "impartially" hearing.....the hearing that the Board had originally set aside for the actual hearing, they told me to allow three days for this....then when we turned up, they said no verbal evidence was allowed and after two hours sent me packing.....I was stuck in wellington for three days because I couldn't afford to change my flights....I was skint.....Wal let me stay at his home for free, he stood by me in this hearing, the next hearing and in high court....for free.

Never once has Wal asked or even hinted for anything, I think I might have bought him a beer, which he begrudgingly took....top bloke.

have a read of all the names present......now look at all the connections to Mr Darnley.....

Perhaps this is why Mr Pedersen can't ask Mr Jackson if its him in the photo, perhaps he wouldn't like the answer......you'll notice that it is stated that the present chair "has never been a member of NZIGE......so (if it is him) is he stood next to Mr Darnley in the photo that Mr Pedersen, hasn't thought to ask Mr Jackson if it is him.......is this reasonable?

You really should read the transcript, especially on the relationships.....what is it if you tell fibs in a court or in a legal function.....


Remember if they stay they would have learnt a lot from this, and now think if someone moves that gas fire to the other side of the room and you have signed it off, took no photos and it blows up........good luck with that, now assume the position.....