Plumbers NZ is New Zealand's largest online plumbing, gas and drainage resource. Plumbing exam help, plumbing news, directory and free quotes.

Author Topic: Fellow Practitioner Issue 236 Dated 12 December 2014  (Read 203510 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Badger

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1981
  • Karma: +222/-151
Re: Fellow Practitioner Issue 236 Dated 12 December 2014
« Reply #165 on: February 09, 2015, 06:53:47 PM »
lets see how we go.........




Dear Mr Gee

 

On behalf of Hon Dr Nick Smith, Minister for Building and Housing, thank you for your email of 3 February 2015 regarding your dispute with the Plumbers, Gasfitters and Drainlayers Board. 

 

Your comments have been noted and you may expect a reply in due course.

 

 

Kind regards,

 

Kate Dixon

Ministerial Secretary

Office of Hon Dr Nick Smith

Minister for the Environment |  Minister for Building and Housing 

Ph: 817-6805  |  Fax: 817-6505

 
You can't choose who you are.....but you are the sum of your choices.......

Offline Badger

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1981
  • Karma: +222/-151
Re: Fellow Practitioner Issue 236 Dated 12 December 2014
« Reply #166 on: February 11, 2015, 07:08:28 AM »
Below in blue, my Reply, all I have done to irk the Board is try to warn about the very real risk to the public that one man posed (not all the gasfitters in my area, as the Board tried to make out).

At the time of my first complaint....my wife was pregnant and this gave me a whole different perspective on life. Once I was told by the previous contractor that when he told Darnley he couldn't fit a type of heater in a bedroom, Darnley just crossed out bedroom and put study......this could be a child's bedroom, plus all the BS  I saw, made me sick.....so I complained to the authorities.

 I had to leave it for a while after my boy was born because he had two massive operations, I told Colleen Singleton about the ops (when I had to go to Wellington for two weeks, to resit all my plumbing licences, remember Darnley got given his full ticket).....Singleton said she wasn't interested in my private life (thought she was a nurse!)........then my father dumped my mother on my door step after 36 years of marriage and the stress revealed her emphascymia. My mum came right, just as the chipshop blew up.




Thank you Kate,

 

Please can you pass to Nick the link below, it is to a Plumbers Forum where I have posted some, and I mean some of the evidence that shows irrefutably how photos and Allgas invoicing was ignored, misrepresented or withheld at my hearing. Done I believe to facilitate a premeditated assault of my character.

 

Some of the people responsible are still at the Board or Secretariat and have continued to cover this up.

 

This cover up was done while very real faulty and dangerous work “backed” by a manipulation of the gas safety certificate system.

 

This has been ignored with very real risks to the NZ public. With the people of our constituency of Nelson bearing the brunt of this risk, I think it is reprehensible that these people have done this. I hope the Minister can see my point.

 

I understand that most of this was not done under his watch so to speak, but it has happened and requires fixing. I am happy to meet with Nick any time that is convenient to us both.

 

Here’s the link.

 

http://www.plumbers.co.nz/forum/fellow-practitioners-update/41/fellow-practitioner-issue-236-dated-12-december-2014/1810/msg9335#msg9335

 

Kate, someone nearly died at Milton Street Chip Shop in Nelson, with a gas certificate intended to record details for safety….. “lost” by the Board, it is a certificate for the last work done…. that all available copies show a lack of testing for leaks at the site of an explosion (there is even an electronic copy on their website), and no one to this day has been held accountable, I don’t think that is right.

 

I am guessing that you might have friends and family that live here in Nelson, please Kate….. please….. ask each and every one of them if they have had any gas work done by a John Darnley, if so please tell them to get it checked. Please read my attachment for some background.

 

I made good money fixing this idiots mistakes, it was never about Darnley, it was about him being willing to put people’s loved ones in harms way.

 

All I have done to put the Board’s nose out of joint….. is to try to tell the powers that be, there is a problem and our neighbours, friends, family are/might be at risk.

 

Best Regards Paul Gee

Offline Badger

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1981
  • Karma: +222/-151
Re: Fellow Practitioner Issue 236 Dated 12 December 2014
« Reply #167 on: February 11, 2015, 07:21:15 AM »
Obviously my mother still has emphyscemia (she collapsed when my father told her), it was her nervous breakdown that she has got over (she is a terrier). My wife sat with her first born with a shaved head, no hair and 49 stiches on his beautiful head, with my mum rocking back and forth picking her nails, crying. That's why I paid my charity donation to the Ronald McDonald House, instead of a tax evading corrupt Board.

Then the chipshop exploded, just as it all this other stuff came right.....then my wife had the sick and twisted case notes sent to her, while her husband got framed for nothing, then was financially forced to sell her home and live in a caravan for a whole winter, collecting drinking water and emptying a chemical toilet. I had to work away for two years. Before any smart arse says anything about hooking up water for her, we were forced to move into a shack in the country with no mains facilities, our old home had just been finished, before we had to sell it, we were mortgage free too.

For these reasons I will never let this go, and really hope they don't push me too far, we all have breaking points (and by breaking point, I don't mean I will be broken, just I will snap)

Offline Jaxcat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1008
  • Karma: +40/-4
Re: Fellow Practitioner Issue 236 Dated 12 December 2014
« Reply #168 on: February 11, 2015, 09:59:30 PM »
Paul
I can't begin to imagine how this has been for you.  Everyone, every single bloody tradesperson working as a plumber, a gasfitter or a drainlayer could find themselves in a similar position.  42 counts that were laid against you - all failed to fly.  How could they come up with 42 counts that wouldn't stick?  By this I mean why did they lay the charges when it appears the evidence just didn't appear to be there.  The shoddy and incompetent investigation is a shameful blight on the PGDB's copy book.  A man's reputation is all he has when everything else is stripped bare.  There hasn't even been an acknowledgement that they got it so wrong on so many levels.

To "accidently" send out letter to your clients implicating you in the fraudulent selling of gas certificates should have cost people their jobs - staff at the PGDB I mean.  And certainly who ever was overseeing it should have lost their job.  I believe it took six months for them to acknowledge the massive cock up this was - but of course then it was too late. 

Who watches the watchers?  Who indeed?  The Minister - he doesn't seem interested - the industry themselves - well maybe they are waking up a bit, but they seem too scared, the Federation - I hope so - but they need the backing of their members - because the one thing that counts is numbers.

Paul - if you could have the Board's attention for five minutes - what would you tell them you wanted from them?  What can put this right?  Can it ever be put right? 

And lastly, how are things going for you now?  Are you still in the trade or have you managed to go in another direction?  I sincerely hope that your wife, your sons and your mum are all faring a little better now. 
Have you learned lessons only of those who admired you, and were tender with you, and stood aside for you?  Have you not learned great lessons from those who braced themselves against you, and disputed the passage with you?  (Walt Whitman 1819-1891)  American Poet

Offline Enn

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 192
  • Karma: +22/-1
  • Ex-chef
Re: Fellow Practitioner Issue 236 Dated 12 December 2014
« Reply #169 on: February 12, 2015, 02:59:09 PM »
Well what can you say.
I hope that you have some positive response from the new minister Badger, He is not doing his job if he does not follow this up. where is his responsibility? or are they all just a pack of Muppet's after all.
So we all work in fear that this could happen  to us if it turns to custard. 100% liability and a punitive regulatory body that will take you to the cleaners with no right of redress it is just not right.
I believe that the board should put away their walloping stick and open dialogue with the industry in a positive and supportive way not a fear based culture. Perhaps more the way that they used to operate.
 I have no problem with manning up and admitting if i have done something that is not right & to put it right. It would seem that this is not the case with everyone....


When the Federation is recognised as a legitimate voice of the industry, not just  a bunch of malcontents then maybe something will change for the better.

my 10 cents worth, anyway I have to keep reasonably positive I'm too old to retrain as a balloon player  8)






''Never have so many been fooled by so few''
Plumbing is not a career it is a disease....

Offline Badger

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1981
  • Karma: +222/-151
Re: Fellow Practitioner Issue 236 Dated 12 December 2014
« Reply #170 on: February 12, 2015, 10:13:30 PM »
Thanks for your tens cents Enn, if no one replies I think I am shouting out into the wind on a dark night, cheers mate for taking the time. Means heaps to me.

Jax,

The thing is it was a premeditated set up job, to frame someone to cover-up a badly run gas cert system, that resulted in an explosion.... a system that was abused to empower a small group of people (mostly untrained incompetents’ with no formal training, but had the “contacts”) while hamstringing and excluding others (basically, the rest of the fully trained industry but with no "contacts")…….this was all done with a massive risk to the public, and still ignored to this day.

This I believe is reprehensible….if it is untrue then I will expect a letter from your lawyer Max (I know you all at the Board read this forum).

Before the 44 charges were laid, 7 sites were “of interest”, I answered these so well that they didn’t even make it to the 44 charges (which they went back out to get), then they amended (changed) over 50% of these 44 charges just weeks from the hearing….I (and all credit to Wal) totally blew 42 of the 44 clean out of the water……

And you have now seen the photos that blows this last BS charge out of the water too….so I did absolutely f**** all wrong, I told the truth with good intentions, with the customers safety first and foremost, even before profit or keeping on side with a bunch of bullies, I was threatened before explosion.

I got a letter from a Board lawyer that says they checked all my work for three years, not the 10% they claimed.

Think about it haven’t these people stolen our careers and our means of making a living; while pontificating about how incompetent we are, while they make “mistakes” and have “oversights” as a regular occurrence, bailed out…….not bloody reprimanded by their minister. Changing the law, rushing it through in urgency….what a crock.

Those letters that ruined my business….these were signed by means of an “electronic signature” signed and sent out by Kern…with out checking that the contents were correct (this is their sanitised version, I believe it was done intentionally)….…..the Board have lost gas certs and accepted certs with very important info missing (missing leak testing FFS), they have lost certs then found them again…… but I was publically humiliated, before my right of appeal….. for not seeing the responsibility in signing off a gas safety cert off………..really! is this reasonable or fair.

I am borne out by the califont photos for this last charge… that what I did was right and what I said at the hearing was true, the inquisitor (not a typo) did no tests and had huge reasons for seeing me ruined. But this one bullshit charge still stands, apparently his reputation is worth more than mine.

It was a search for a scapegoat, to hide how bad the cert system was run that resulted in an explosion, done at my expense whilst terrorising my wife.

I had to listen to other tradesman call me dodgy and knock me for dobbing everyone in (the Board audited two jobs of most if not all the gasfitter’s in my area), that’s if I was lucky enough to actually be on site, because the lying letters that were written……well they killed my business, and all the many other “press releases” thereafter drove home the final nails in its coffin.

Customers knew me as the “guy who blew up the chippy”…..after I had probably got into this mess trying to do right by the same customers/public trying to warn about dodgy work in their homes.

I was financially forced to sell our just finished home and leave my wife and our 4 and 6 year olds in a caravan for a whole winter, while I was working in another island…..before this I wouldn’t even go out of town with out them. I was mortgage free in a modest house with no debt, my van, tools and car all paid for.

But then….I had to listen to my wife cry in to her pillow while all this went on, then leave them all at the airport while I flew all over NZ for 5 to 6 weeks at a time, leaving them all crying, while I went and crawled under houses and worked in shit. If I was lucky I might be able to afford a week home with them, every 6 weeks. I did this for two years, sleeping the rest of the time in a caravan, the same one my family lived in.....anyone want to buy it, we don't like going on holiday anymore in it.

Paul - if you could have the Board's attention for five minutes - what would you tell them you wanted from them?  What can put this right?  Can it ever be put right?

•   An apology to my wife, hand written and with sincerity, hand delivered.
•   For the Board to put as much effort, money, time and publicity in restoring my reputation as they did in ruining it.
•   Leave me where they found me…in a mortgage free home with a business so I can feed my kids and spend time with them.
•   Return to me and my wife my sons missing “family” years, Joe’s years of 4 to 6 and Mike’s years of 6 to 8.
•   Remove from my memory of seeing my wife hysterical sobbing thinking that these goons were threatening us with the contents of the sick and twisted case notes, because I thought about that a lot when I was living in the same caravan that she had to live in the previous year, laying there wondering if they were ok.
•   And a charity boxing match with Kern.

And lastly, how are things going for you now?  Are you still in the trade or have you managed to go in another direction?  I sincerely hope that your wife, your sons and your mum are all faring a little better now.


I am with my family all I can be, my girl is doing very good at the local bank (I am very proud of her), I got to KNOW my wife is one hell of an amazing person, who for some strange reason thinks as much of me as I do her, my boys are amazing. We are all happier than we have been for a very long time. Since April 2009.

But I am a fully qualified certifying plumber and gasfitter, with a trade electrical ticket, 25years experience, able enough to face a directed assault by an industry Board....… who has had to start at the bottom in another industry, where I am reminded everyday that this is not my industry, but I will do it day in day out to be with my family.

Offline Badger

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1981
  • Karma: +222/-151
Re: Fellow Practitioner Issue 236 Dated 12 December 2014
« Reply #171 on: February 13, 2015, 05:53:20 PM »
It like a bad joke, here is the response to a request, remember the one I made whether the present chair and panel member at one of my hearings Mr Jackson, is stood next to Mr Darnley at a meeting for NZIGE, the person who most if not all the evidence points to at the site of the explosion.....apparently it is frivolous for me to ask....Max is taking his ball home.....wouldn't be easier to clear it up and just say, its not him, if its not him....wait there perhaps it is him....the plot thickens....lol.

Max appears to think that a potential serious conflict of interest is a frivolous matter, or at least me asking to find out.....

It cracks me up, I always get his replies as late as he can on a Friday, is it because he thinks I might have a beer and might get rise out of me, I don't know why he would think this.....lol, its so blatant. The letter is dated 13th , but the email is dated 12 02 15 , which is done automatic? so perhaps he wrote it yesterday but waited to send it a day later. Nice Maxy.

Max your reluctance to answer this simple question speaks volumes....your non answer lets me know, what I suspect.......

Have a look at the two responses.....so what do you guys think......could it be Mr Jackson stood next to Mr Darnley....back in 2006 when I tried to get all this looked into, before a guy nearly died in an explosion........all reattached for your convenience.....have a great week end, even you Max...lol.

Offline Badger

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1981
  • Karma: +222/-151
Re: Fellow Practitioner Issue 236 Dated 12 December 2014
« Reply #172 on: February 13, 2015, 09:20:50 PM »
This is a recent press release from Max.......now apply these words to how I got screwed over and how they have ignored certain jobs....its like a parallel universe....






Plumbing, gasfitting and drainlaying are regulated industries in New Zealand and it is illegal for anyone to do this work unless they are authorised to do so by the Plumbers, Gasfitters and Drainlayers Board.

The Board’s Chief Executive, Max Pedersen said: “The growth in building consent applications is positively impacting the construction sector nationwide, but this is particularly evident in Auckland.”

“As a result consumers should be on the lookout for illegal operators. History tells us that with the increase in jobs, there is always an increase in the number of illegal operators appearing.

“The health and safety risks associated with plumbing carried out by an unauthorised person are serious. Any defective work has the potential to cause disease and serious damage to the property.”

A recent industry working group calculated that 8000 more carpenters and joiners, electricians, plumbers, painters, bricklayers, drainlayers, gasfitters, insulation installers and motor mechanics will be required in Auckland by 2018.

“The Board will continue to keep a watchful eye in relation to unlicensed workers in the Auckland region,” Mr Pedersen added.

All authorised tradespeople are required to carry their current authorisation card. Consumers should ask tradespeople for this card before any work commences. This way they can be assured that the work is being done by an authorised and competent tradesperson.

If a homeowner believes that work has been done by someone who is not authorised, or has concerns about the competency of tradespeople, they can make a complaint to the Board.

Ends




With these figures in red above......how are we going to cope with people leaving in droves.........oh wait there.......there will be a monopoly.......

Offline Badger

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1981
  • Karma: +222/-151
Re: Fellow Practitioner Issue 236 Dated 12 December 2014
« Reply #173 on: February 13, 2015, 09:24:06 PM »
Oh wait there....... my mistake......Darnley was "authorised" after he was "given" his ticket...........so it was all ok. It is a joke.

Offline Jaxcat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1008
  • Karma: +40/-4
Re: Fellow Practitioner Issue 236 Dated 12 December 2014
« Reply #174 on: February 13, 2015, 09:47:35 PM »
I've had a look at that photo and I wouldn't be prepared to say that was Mr Jackson - it's not clear enough.  Was he on the list of attendees?   The only person I recognise besides Mr Parker is Dr Palmer who was the Technical Manager for Master Plumbers back in the day and he would have attended these sort of meetings as he is a pretty knowledgeable guy with plenty of technical nous.  Sorry Badger, but this might be a real case of not being able to identify someone.

Offline Badger

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1981
  • Karma: +222/-151
Re: Fellow Practitioner Issue 236 Dated 12 December 2014
« Reply #175 on: February 13, 2015, 11:03:31 PM »
But wouldn't you ask him if its him?

It just seems strange to not answer....I totally agree it isn't clear, that's why I asked......there are enough people in the photo to prove my point about how entwined Darnley was with Hammond (the investigator) and Parker (the chair of the Board and my hearing) alone, that's bad enough mate, I just wanted to know how many others were there.

Yes I recognise Dr Palmer and a few others, but these people didn't vote themselves impartial, just before they screwed me over, just looking for a bit of clarification Jax.

The thing is I was/and am still not against the Board, Master Plumbers, NZIGE or any other groups, I am all for proper CPD and think for us to loose an overseer for the industry a complete mistake.....I just think it should be run fairly with the public's safety put before mates and little clubs.

I genuinely thought I was trying to fix things, I could see something was going to happen so I tried to warn about it....

The thing is, and I was told this by a few people......a certain person only joined these groups/clubs just so they can do what they do, sometimes tarnishing the reputations of the groups they join, but they join just to further themselves......what I am trying to say is these groups should be more pissed off with these people for dragging these groups down.


Really and I am a big boy, I can take it......WTF did I do to piss off certain plumbers, let me know, even if it is what you heard.....because I haven't got a clue, except that I tried to warn about things I thought were dangerous.

Offline Badger

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1981
  • Karma: +222/-151
Re: Fellow Practitioner Issue 236 Dated 12 December 2014
« Reply #176 on: February 15, 2015, 10:58:27 AM »
I just want a fair go, and I don't think that the people who are entrusted with the public's safety should do their job, especially as they are a registered charity for this purpose...is this reasonable?









Mr Pederson,

 

Please can you let me know when I might receive a reply to the email below? These photos prove beyond doubt that my testimony at my hearing was true and the investigators unfounded. Thus leaving me 100% innocent of any wrong doing.

 

Also, and the reason for this email, by means of an OIA request please can I get a copy of John Darnley’s “fairly extensive” file mentioned below in Mr Uren’s testimony from my hearing?

 

I believe it is a reasonable request and assure you I do not do this to be frivolous nor vexatious, but do it in the public’s interest and for the public’s safety. I do not require any names or addresses, just the content so to speak. You must understand that even though the man has retired, the work is very much still out there.

 

Just like the legionnaires risk that the Board are prepared to ignore, this is a massive gamble. Not to mention the hypocrisy of ignoring a very similar case to that of the one that the Board have held on to, i.e. the one mentioned below.

 

Of note Mr Darnley was already retired when the chip-shop exploded. His punishment, for the 100% conviction rate can be summed up to a $10,000 fine and allowed to carry on in his beachside retirement. While my 100% innocence cost me my home, business, reputation and time with my family. I think this is unreasonable.

 

 

 

To all you copied in, this is the person who has been ignored by the Board, where most, if not all of the evidence points to his causing, or at the very least having a massive involvement in the actions leading up to an explosion that nearly killed someone.

 

I am sure there was at least one other incident, that would be in this file I have requested may be more.

 

May I point out that he worked totally unsupervised in Nelson for well over 10 years, empowered by a full certifying licence gifted to him without any formal training by Tony Hammond, who was also gifted his full certifying licence with no formal apprenticeship. Mr Hammond was awarded this during his investigation into me while acting as the investigator for my witch-hunt. 

 

I say to you all it is a cover up done at a very real risk to the public, it is wrong. The Board have ignored real concerns that are a risk to the public and trumped up charges to persecute me.

 

Please see below the testimony of Mr Uren,

 

 

Q. What about Mr Darnley?

A. I can't recall.

Q. When you were checking the files of Mr Darnley did you notice if he'd had previous encounters with the Board?

A. Ah yes, Mr Darnley has a fairly extensive file. 

Q. And do you know if there was anything on there about gas certificates being altered or created by Mr Darnley?

A. It's been a while since I've looked at the file, I can't say categorically so I'd need to have a look at it again.

Q. You are a wee bit hesitant there, do you think there was something in there regarding -

A. I'm just saying I can't recall.

Q. You can't recall?

A. Yeah.

 

What happens if we have another “chipshop” incident?

 

 

 

Best Regards Paul Gee


 

 


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: Paul & Emma Gee [mailto:gasnsolarservices@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, 2 February 2015 5:48 p.m.
To: 'Paul & Emma Gee'; 'Registrar'; 'communications@pgdb.co.nz'; 'complaints@pgdb.co.nz'
Cc: 'Wal Gordon'; 'Allan Day'; 'Colleen Upton'; 'Lyndon Moffitt'; 'campbelllive@tv3.co.nz'; 'Andrew Little'; 'jacinda.ardern@parliament.govt.nz'; 'Janis Adair'; 'Jude Hutton'
Subject: RE: Letter responding to 26 Nov email

 

 

 

Mr Pedersen,

 

Please can you review the Board’s position on my last and final charge. I have done no wrong.

 

In light of these photos attached, which prove my testimony to be correct and the investigators incorrect.

 

Please base your reconsideration on my already entered testimony at the hearing, no addducement required….. all my testimony is true and my diagrams correct, please also see Mr Hammonds statement at my hearing that he had no idea if the fumes were entering the building.

 

The top of the guttering is 535 mm from the top of the flue spigot, and bear in mind that the wall would have been flat and the window restricted to opening 100mm, it is an impossibility for the fumes to enter. Photo attached…also attached is a photo where someone from the Board told the customer to “just shut the window when you use it”. For some scale the garage opposite is over 3 mtrs away.

 

It is an “Emperors New Clothes” scenario to hold on to this one last charge. The photos prove what the owner stated at my hearing and that my testimony was true, that it was never a problem.

 

The Board has based their whole decision on the “opinion” of one conflicted person……I lost my home and business because of this……is this reasonable?

 

Best Regards Paul Gee

 

Offline Badger

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1981
  • Karma: +222/-151
Re: Fellow Practitioner Issue 236 Dated 12 December 2014
« Reply #177 on: February 15, 2015, 10:59:43 AM »
*they should do their job.....another typo, lol.

Offline Badger

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1981
  • Karma: +222/-151
Re: Fellow Practitioner Issue 236 Dated 12 December 2014
« Reply #178 on: February 15, 2015, 11:38:11 AM »
Just to be clear, all the charges that Darnley faced.... he was done for, but although he faced a charge for the chip-shop (which just  "disappeared") nothing was pursued in the direction of the explosion.....you have seen some of the evidence supplied on this link.


Is this reasonable........




Of note Mr Darnley was already retired when the chip-shop exploded. His punishment, for the 100% conviction rate can be summed up to a $10,000 fine and allowed to carry on in his beachside retirement. While my 100% innocence cost me my home, business, reputation and time with my family. I think this is unreasonable.

Offline Badger

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1981
  • Karma: +222/-151
Re: Fellow Practitioner Issue 236 Dated 12 December 2014
« Reply #179 on: February 15, 2015, 01:19:15 PM »

So definitely, with out a shadow of any doubt….. Allgas Ltd, managed by Darnley, THE certifying gasfitter carried out the actions below....this is all available to the Board, they actually gave this evidence to me and it appears in the hearing bundle…..

No one from the office (Darnley’s Daughter and Wife) were ever questioned about it and Darnley faced a charge for the chip shop explosion but it disappeared before his hearing (all his “other” charges were substantiated)….is this reasonable……

The Ombudsman, has all this evidence too, but  has used his discretion to not look at how the investigation was carried out……Fairness for All?????? Perhaps the “for” should be replaced with another F word…..

•   Weeks after I had left Allgas and months after the initial install, Allgas sold the owners of the exploding chipshop another hose to one of the fryers, this was to replace a hose that had split; this replacement is the hose that caused the explosion.

•   It ruptured because someone had lowered the 2 x wing backs and turned one of these wing backs 90 degrees by straightening out a 90 degree bend in the pexal pipe that supplied this wing back. This lowering and straightening out of the pipe made the bayonet point directly to the floor, nearly touching the floor, instead of to the right and much higher up.

•   This lowering is also borne out by some of the 110 withheld photos taken by the forensic expert. These photos show old drill holes (the ones I did) and pipe that goes down the wall at about 30 degrees, in contrast to the rest of the install, and all the other photos taken of my work, where the pipe is level…. either horizontal or vertical, I use a level when running pipe work. I had supplied drawing to this effect before the hearing.

•   This lowering caused the hose to be stressed along the stretched outer wall and split.

•   The hose was also according to the forensic expert....minus some of its outer sheath, showing evidence of it being cut away.

•   Altered the cylinder station from the original. This is shown by the difference between what was invoiced for at the time (Allgas invoices) billed for the initial pre-pipe and what is shown in the forensic photos of the destroyed building, Allgas were supplying the gas when the pizza oven was installed, this was when it was probably changed to allow both sides of cylinders to draw, because of the extra load of the pizza oven.

•   Fitted a Pizza oven half way along, with all copies of the cert (345138, filled out by Darnley) showing the test results missing. The copy attached is the certifier’s copy, the one supplied to Dept of Labour…. after the complaint and after the explosion. This copy shows the leak test results empty. The Board claim to not have received a copy of this cert, this claim was made to the owner’s lawyer just days after he nearly died in an explosion and was laying in a burns unit in Wellington. Even though this was claimed, just days after the explosion, some one had, at the Board, entered a copy of this cert on to the “fox pro” data base not long after the time of the pizza oven’s installation.

•   You’ll notice on the back of the job card (attached) that in my writing it shows that I only installed the bayonets (there are no appliances drawn), and on the front it shows another hand who has added the 2 x fryers, the 2 x cylinder numbers and a second leak test (who ever wrote this, I believe added the fryers after I did the initial pre-pipe).

•   Also of note is the ink on the pink copy of the cert for the fryers is in two different colour inks, the “15” on the test date is in blue and the rest of the test date is in black along with the entries under “flue” and “ventilation”. The 2 under “quantity” has been changed, the only thing in my hand writing is the signature, the appliances being empty when I signed it.


Is this reasonable……do you have confidence in these people to go after you when it suits them, or if one of their mates is in trouble and they can go you instead of one of their cronies?

How many of you have done as you were told by your boss and not gone back to check that nothing has been added, according to the Board it is common practice for someone in the office to fill out your certs for you to sign……how are you going to prove you did nothing wrong?

Isn’t disturbing that I have this wealth of info, can make this many posts…..and the people in charge do sweet FA with the last bastion of fairness for all, using his discretion not to look at it……is this reasonable?

I was awarded a $500 cash payment from Helen Cull to go with my apology for the letters that lied about me, I told the Board to send it to The Ronald Mc Donald house in Christchurch, to the best of my knowledge they kept it, not very charitable behaviour for a charity.

How do you feel about financing this system?

No One seems to give a shit about us…..



Share via digg Share via facebook Share via linkedin Share via twitter

Similar Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies / Views Last post
clip
Fellow Practitioner Issue 235 Dated 5 December 2014

Started by Wal

5 Replies
2694 Views
Last post December 10, 2014, 09:43:07 AM
by Jaxcat
clip
Fellow Practitioner Issue 184 Dated 6 December 2013

Started by Wal

2 Replies
2290 Views
Last post December 06, 2013, 02:13:52 PM
by Jaxcat
clip
Fellow Practitioner Issue 185 Dated 13 December 2013

Started by Wal

5 Replies
2800 Views
Last post December 13, 2013, 04:01:14 PM
by robbo
clip
Fellow Practitioner Issue 186 Dated 20 December 2013

Started by Wal

1 Replies
1560 Views
Last post December 23, 2013, 06:39:28 AM
by Watchdog
 
Share this topic...
In a forum
(BBCode)
In a site/blog
(HTML)