How you apply fairness is the real test, not what you say but what you do, words are just words without action, I believe the real test is how you apply fairness to those less connected, those smaller than the rest.....how you treat the weak.....


If you only provide "fairness" to the strong and connected..... you are not applying fairness at all.....you are applying partiality, you are bullying the weak, you are putting the weak at a disadvantage, you are weighting and slanting the field.....


This is so wrong on so many levels.

Sent tonight......if people think that I will let this go then they are more delusional than those that think we get a fair go and play on an even playing field and believe me they are right out there.....







Dear Mr Little,

 

Please see below some links to the “Plumbers Forum” it has nearly 28 thousand views to date and also a blog I have circulated that gives a brief background of the corruption levelled on my family by the PGDB.

 

 

http://www.plumbers.co.nz/forum/fellow-practitioners-update/41/fellow-practitioner-issue-236-dated-12-december-2014/1810/msg10325#msg10325

 

http://coverupforanexplosion.blogspot.co.nz/2012/05/is-this-cover-up.html

 
I wrote late last year, please see the email below; please can you help me and my family.

 

 

We continually live with the stigma of this corruption every day; I am forced to work out of my industry everyday just to make ends meet. I am reminded every day that I am new to this new industry and at the age of 44, I am a trainee and that I am at the bottom of the pile.

 

 

What do I have to do to get a fair go?

 

 

My young families life was turned upside down by a bunch of corrupts. It appears that my only crime was to try and warn about dodgy gas work being covered by dodgy gas certs for 6 years before someone got hurt, then lo and behold……when my fears actually came to pass with a near fatal explosion….and was covered by a very dodgy certificate. I even named the person who all the evidence points to for the explosion in my warnings made 6 years before the explosion.

 

But I was blamed, set up and made the scape goat. I will not let this be my legacy to my sons; sadly it appears only extreme measures get any traction these days.

 

 

I have a massive amount of evidence and correspondence which I am happy to put at your disposal if you will just look into it and judge it on the facts. Kiwis have been put at risk (and I believe still at risk), just to protect the egos and reputations of some very corrupt people……this is wrong on so many levels.

 

I have tried Mr Key, but he used his recent mantra…..that he has passed it to the minister responsible……who is Dr Smith of Nelson, where the explosion happened….. in Dr Smiths own back yard…… to his own constituents…..still nothing has been done. Dr Smith actually in writing, initially backed me up…..until he got his “good friend” (Dr Smiths words) on to the Board….then he wanted nothing to do with it.

 

Still to this day no one has been held accountable for the explosion, even in the presence of over whelming damning evidence……the person who all this evidence points to could have been asked at his hearing……but even though he faced a charge for the explosion…….the charge disappeared before his hearing……how does that happen Mr Little?

 

Please can you help us?

 

 

Yours Sincerely Paul Gee

I must drop Judith a line when she gets back....





Judith Collins

6 May, 2016

Police Minister to attend London Anti-Corruption Summit


Police Minister, Judith Collins will represent the Prime Minister at the London Anti-Corruption Summit being hosted by UK Prime Minister David Cameron on 12 May 2016.

The Summit will promote the importance of exposing corruption, punishing those responsible and supporting those who have suffered, and driving out the culture of corruption, where it exists.

“The Summit is an opportunity to promote New Zealand’s reputation as one of the least corrupt countries in the world and demonstrate our commitment as a responsible member of the international community,” says Ms Collins.

World leaders from the G20, as well as other nations who face challenges with corruption, will agree a package of practical steps to counter corruption at the Summit.

New Zealand has recently taken steps to combat corruption. Last year Parliament passed the Organised Crime and Anti-corruption Legislation Bill in November 2015, which enabled New Zealand to ratify the United Nations Convention Against Corruption.

Prime Minister Cameron is also inviting the leaders of the world’s major international institutions that play a key role in anti-corruption efforts around the globe.

While there, Ms Collins will call on the Victims’ Commissioner for England and Wales, the Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police, the Under Secretary of State for Prisons and the Director of the SFO. Ms Collins will also visit a prison.

Ms Collins returns to New Zealand on 16 May 2016.

So.....


New Zealand has recently taken steps to combat corruption. Last year Parliament passed the Organised Crime and Anti-corruption Legislation Bill in November 2015, which enabled New Zealand to ratify the United Nations Convention Against Corruption.


But is ok to allow to allow Tony Hammond to be appointed as an investigator , against my many complaints about his conflicts of interest, where he misrepresents evidence, makes untrue affidavits and withholds over 100 forensic photos, all the evidence points to John Darnley, the same John Darnley who Tony Hammond gifted a full certifying gas license to.

John Darnley faces a charge for the explosion but it disappears before Darnley's hearing, all the evidence points to Darnley.

I end up being made the scape goat at a hearing overseen by Stephen Parker, Tony Hammond's colleague for many years and members of the same industry groups...Stephen shuts down the hearing just as we are pushing Hammond on the last of the charges, this is the only charge that I was found "guilty of" out of 44.....no one is held responsible for the explosion.

Nick Smith backs me until he gets his "good friend " on to the Board, this same guy goes in my local paper and further slates me after the hearing.....for an "offence" that Board decides to ignore just months later. All of these people mentioned above are members of the same industry groups.

After my hearing I find that the Board knew about a gas cert issued for the last work done at the site of the explosion, the cert is missing a test for leaks....at the site of an explosion....claimed to have never been accepted/received by the Board...even though it appears on their FoxPro system.....

So they appoint as the investigator, Tony Hammond to investigate this explosion....the same guy who lobbied heavily for the self cert system, and the same tony who gifted Darnley the gas certing license......


Where's my dictionary........must look up what corruption means.......

I lost my trade and way to provide for my family, after warning for 6 years about Darnley....BEFORE THE EXPLOSION...


Until I clear my name, I can't have my life back......I am reminded about this every day, every day I am reminded I am new to a new industry, a trainee at 44 years of age.

Badger, by now you will have realised that the govt does not do as it says, that the actions almost never match the election promises. Dont hold your breath for any honesty from those in power.

Just to recap then....

In Allgas's own words, attached is letter of my term of employment, this was all in the possession of the Investigator. I worked for these dodgy people from 24th Feb 2003 to 2nd Dec 2003.

So how could I have fitted the hose sold on 21st Jan 04, the original install was done June 03, this is the hose that caused the explosion, sold after I left, you'll notice the receipt looks like it was taken from a bound set of documents, that's because it was taken from the "bundle" for my hearing, the Board's bundle.

Also in the third attachment you'll see some one asking, in my name, for the Board to alter a cert in March 2004, three months after I left.


All of this evidence was in the Board's possession before my hearing, but it was Darnley who's charge for the explosion disappeared before his hearing, whereas I was subjected to a hearing where evidence was withheld, lying letters sent to my customers and plenty of public slating in the local paper.

And here in the previous Registrars own words......the disappearing charge, for the explosion.

No body has been able to explain to me how, in the face of undeniable and blatant evidence, can a charge just disappear before a hearing......how does that happen?

Any takers?

The board says it's now completed its investigation and two men, aged 53 and 38, are due to appear at a Disciplinary Tribunal hearing in February.

.......but the 53 year old faced a charge for the explosion.....AND IT DISSAPEARED......the 38 year old (me ) had evidence and photos misrepresented and withheld....with most if not all evidence points to the 53year old (Darnley).

It mentions in these comments from the poor guy who watched his skin fall off and spent two weeks in intensive care, he mentions certificates......and the ex ceo (old Routhan) says there are 100's of dodgy certs.......

The last cert for the explosion issued was missing the "test for leaks" field, it was blank, but it was apparently accepted by the Board......I say apparently because they deny ever having received it......


BUT IT APPEARS ON THEIR WEBSITE CERT  HAVE A LOOK FOR YOURSELF........CERT 345138