So the Ombudsman is happy with how I was treated see below..............I have met others now who have similar stories, it is so wrong
Have a read of this guys story.....then compare to mine....
http://newzealandjusticeandpolitics.weebly.com/ Cowboys and Idiots……A Cover Up.
I understand that the plumbing and gasfitting industry is considered by most as neither glamorous nor all that interesting and it isn’t ranked as “professional” by the so called professionals like lawyers, psychologists and engineers. These professionals by the way are usually the people who govern our trade and who from my experience show a total disregard and utter disrespect towards us.
Like most essential everyday things that are integral to our lives plumbing, gas and drainlaying is hidden, nondescript and plain. It happens behind walls, under houses and in the ground.
The Gas industry is working today under a gas certificate system during a housing shortage of 60,000 houses that is not only susceptible to cause accidents and empower cowboys but I believe it is actually prone to it.
At one time we had independent of the trade, an inspected gas safety system; with inspectors that were financed by the gas supply companies. It was in the company’s interest to get it right because the liability lay with those selling the gas, reinvesting their profits in the common good and safety of the public.
In the early 90’s the rampant ideology and dogma of deregulation came along, putting profit before safety. Doing away with inspectors and putting those making a profit from installing gas in control of quality and safety, whilst weighing this up against their profit margin.
Most are honest and are observing the proper procedures and standards, but apparently there are those that do not. I am told some of the worst that aren’t observing are the ones with “connections”, acting with impunity because they can and have in the past and will until they stop getting away with it.
Within the gasfitting industry this deregulation introduced a self certificate system, with certificates sold by batches identified by a unique cert number sold only to a specific licence holder.
These unique certs had a triple carbon copy of the original handwritten top copy; this top copy was then held by the PGDB. With the subsequent carbon copy then held by the gas supplier, the gasfitter and the customer.
These four independent document depositories was an effective honesty mechanism with a handwritten checkable way of filling the cert in, with a real signature done by hand. This has all gone now.
The onus was moved to the fitter, you might say “as it should”. But now we had the problem of those making a financial gain from the installation of gas, inspecting their own work, with random audits by the PGDB. But even these audits and this more robust self cert system has since proved to be untenable and has ceased.
This system made the installer liable for the install, freeing the gas company’s to sell a volatile flammable gas with a very much reduced liability.
GANZ represents the suppliers of gas. GANZ via the so called “impartial” inspector for my case lobbied for this deregulation. Impartial he was not. GANZ was also the group that the chair of my hearing was a member. These two people represented GANZ for many years as a double act at seminars and trade shows.
I give you this background to give you an idea of the conflicts of interest involved in my case.
The cover up started with an explosion, which resulted in two families lives being wrecked (mine and the owner of the exploding chipshop) with this poor blast victim laying in a drug induced coma for weeks in a burns unit. The cover up started while he lay in this coma, covered up by the PGDB.
I began working for a gas company called Allgas in February 2003, situated in Nelson.
Nelson being the long term electorate of Nick Smith, the now Building and Housing Minister, with the PGDB under his portfolio. He had other portfolios at the start of this fiasco and moved into this position after the explosion.
I left this employment at Allgas after only approx 9 months after seeing a total disregard for the safety of their customers and left because of these safety concerns.
The day after I told my old boss to shove his job where the sun doesn’t shine, four books of gas safety certificates (certs) were ordered in my name with out my knowledge. I found out after the explosion that also a letter was written, again acting in my name without my knowledge to alter a cert months after I had left.
Literally as soon as I left Allgas I started work for another gas supplier and instantly became aware of dodgy certs in my name, covering dangerous altered work.
I began complaining to the PGDB from this time on in late 2003. I also made my concerns known to industry groups (I was the Nelson Master Plumber President and brought it up at meetings) and MPs (Nick Smith included).
Nothing other than flannel was done. The explosion happened in 2009.
At one point in 2006 Nick Smith wrote a letter on my behalf airing my concerns to the PGDB, he even backed me calling for a public inquiry in his other letters after the explosion, even right up to my hearing in May 2011.
But the month following my hearing (after placing his “very good friend” on the PGDB), Nick totally changed his tact to a “nothing to see here” attitude, even when he now had the portfolio under which all this fiasco comes. Nicks “very good friend” did not see out his tenure as PGDB Chairman and resigned for personal reasons later on, resigning after my hearing and after he slated me in my local Newspaper.
My old boss was installing gas in homes and businesses in Nelson for well over 10 years very probably nearer 20 years, he was totally clueless and I think an MP owes it to his electorate to look into this to ensure those that vote him in are kept safe.
The people of Nelson thought they were dealing with a fully qualified craftsman gas fitter who was a member of the gas engineers group NZIGE, when in reality he had never sat an apprenticeship and was totally inept. He resigned from NZIGE in May 2009 just weeks after the April explosion.
My old boss’s attitude to safety can be summed up in the comment that added to my leaving Allgas. He told me to “just use a poker face and make out you know what you’re was doing”.
He said this when I asked for an appliance specification data sheet. I asked for this specification as I saw him installing central heating in a house where the radiator water comes out of the hot water system, and as far as I am aware it still does.
The chip shop exploded on 9th April 2009, at 09:40 approx in the morning, either side of this time the chipshop and adjoining dairy would have been surrounded by kids on the way to school or full of people buying smoko. It had a butcher’s shop full length plate glass windows as a shop front. The blast shot this glass out like a shotgun. The thought of what could have happened still gives me nightmares.
As the blast victim lay in a coma in intensive care, the telling of ridiculous untruths began and a scapegoat was sort after.
The PGDB told the blast victim’s lawyer that the original top copy of the certificate for the last work done at the site of the explosion (totally in the name of my old boss and issued years after I left Allgas) could not be produced as this cert was never received by the PGDB.
This claim of non registration is very hard to believe as this “un-registered” cert appears on the PGDB website and the PGDB even have a date of entry for this cert from their fox-pro data system, this system cost 600k and is now defunct.
This cert is also mentioned by number in the Dept. of Labour complaint with all available carbon copies showing the lack of recording of a pressure test for leaks, the test for leaks field is empty on all carbon copies, the original top copy can’t be found.
My old boss is the person totally responsible for this cert for the last gas work at the site of the explosion. Even by the PGDB’s own reckoning he fails to register this incomplete cert with the PGDB, but issues the carbon copies to their respective places.
This non registration, if it were true, is enough to lay charges and pursue my old boss. And as I had spent the previous 6 years warning specifically about my old boss and his dodgy dealings with certs the PGDB should not have targeted me.
The same guy (my old boss) who is responsible for the “non registered” and incomplete cert nearly burnt down a house just over a year before the explosion and anonymously appears in the government accident book. Here are the comments.
Date: 27/12/2007
Location: Nelson
Equipment: Water heater
Accident type: Fire
Losses: A house was rendered uninhabitable due to fire and smoke damage. A water heater was destroyed.
Summary of events: Pipework in a gas installation had been pressure tested but appliances had not been commissioned. The owner received permission from the installer to turn on the gas and use it (the installer was to commission the next day). Due to a leaking fitting, fire ignited in an external instantaneous water heater mounted in a recess box. Heat from the gas fire ignited the soffit above and the fire spread into the ceiling space.
Suspected causes and significant factors: The appliance had not been commissioned and gas leaked from a loose fitting. Gas built up in the recess box and was ignited, probably from use of the water heater.
My old boss actually did face a charge for the explosion, but it conveniently disappeared before his hearing. I believe this doubling up of charges was done because if the PGDB ensured we both faced a charge for the same explosion, we would had to have separate hearings (they actually made this statement)…..this prevented us from cross examining my old boss at a common hearing.
I was chosen for the role of scapegoat in a witch-hunt that saw my young family terrorised and we were financially forced to sell our recently renovated home, loosing our business and reputation. This forced my wife to live in a caravan for a whole winter collecting drinking water and emptying a chemical toilet at the local i-site, while I worked away in the North Island for that winter, the first of many. Before the explosion we had very little debt, only what we owed at the plumbers merchants. We were mortgage free and owned all our vehicles and tools.
One of the worst things that happened to us was the sending of case notes on probabilities in a law court, sent in an unmarked wrapper of its vile content. The three cases chosen and were all sexually deviant but the worst were the child sexual abuse case notes. I came home to find my wife hysterical, she had read them and not long after this she had to live in the caravan while I worked away.
I have either worked away within my trade or worked locally out of my trade since, my reputation being ruined and all my money tied up in an almost derelict shack of a house which I can’t sell, but we live in.
My old boss, the person I was complaining about for about 6 years before the explosion was gifted his full license by the PGDB after one oral exam, basically a chat. This saw him rise from a guy working under an exemption license to a full certifying craftsman license. This enabled him to sign off any gas work. He had served no apprenticeship whatsoever and was only a gas salesman, not even a plumber, which ran a gas company, i.e. Allgas. He was willing (and this is also known to the PGDB) to sign off anyone, even the untrained and unqualified.
The PGDB then appointed as investigator to investigate the explosion and both my old boss and me, the very same person who held that one oral exam and gifted the full certifying craftsman gas license to my old boss.
The investigator then audited me and when I explained that initial audit and answered all his concerns, questions and potential charges, he re-audited me a second time. I have actually got a PGDB letter that the PGDB audited three full years of my work, but the PGDB publically claim to have only done a sample of 10% of my work.
Basically the investigator kept going until he found something he thought he could pin on me.
When I answered these later set of second charges before the hearing, he amended 50% of these charges and also laid several charges for each of the sites. This is how he managed to get 44 charges out of just seven sites. The charges were stepped in severity and he tried to get the most severe charges to stick first, then worked his way down.
Well before the hearing the PGDB sent untrue letters to all the additional sites to the explosion that charges were laid. The letters told the untruth that I was issuing illegal certs in the North Island, in places I have never even visited. I am not allowed to call them lies.
The PGDB agree in their later apology, issued well after my hearing, that these letters could have given the impression that I was willing to act illegally, basically in their own words prejudicing every site additional to the explosion that I was willing to act illegally when it came to issuing gas certs.
One of the untrue letters, the one sent to the local high school, killed my business and reputation. I was abused on worksites by other tradesman, (when I could actually get work).
Interestingly the totally unrelated reason for these untrue PGDB letters were the problems found when someone in the North Island sold 560 certs. He sold them blank except for his signature….someone involved in this has his case still before the PGDB.
Sixteen of the sites of these blank certs were potentially lethal and 90% were non compliant.
The guy responsible for these certs was still granted a license for some time afterwards, until he retired…..then the PGDB granted his son a full certifying license…..in the same manner as my old boss, same gas group memberships and AFTER the explosion….the PGDB had learnt nothing.
I paid a lawyer to act for me and turned down name suppression; the lawyer took well in excess of $10K off me….. then told me to plead guilty.
After ceasing the use of this lawyer’s services, I met Wal Gordon of the Plumber’s Federation he has been a huge help to not just me but to the industry as a whole.
We requested an impartiality hearing before the actual hearing because there were blatant conflicts of interest. The PGDB then went on to decide that they themselves were impartial, which is impossible.
You can not decide yourself, if you yourself, are impartial. Apart from being really bad grammar the decision alone makes you a party to the proceedings, not to mention all the obvious relationships and groups they all belonged to and happily ignored.
This so called impartial investigator went on to present his “findings” at a hearing which was chaired and over seen by his very long term colleague of at least 16 years. This very well known colleague then shut down the hearing as we were cross examining the investigator about the details of the last charge and I was about to go 100% innocent. I answered 42 out of 44 trumped up charges, the only charge to stick was to be frank total bullshit, but they slated me in the local paper anyway.
Of note: Some time later, about 18 months after my hearing the PGDB ignored the complaints of an elderly couple for the very same issue but in a much worse situation. They actually complained about fumes entering their home (my customer was happy with my installation and had never smelt fumes). The PGDB told them to close the window when they use their califont.
Also my hearing showed a certificate manipulation perhaps a fraud on the West Coast unconnected to Allgas and Nelson, this still goes unaddressed.
No one has been held responsible for the explosion, nor any of the sites of the other charges, nor the potential fraud on the West Coast, all of which I was found innocent of and nothing has been rectified.
So, apart from the explosion, you got to ask how dangerous was it all? Apparently it was dangerous enough to ruin me over, but not so dangerous as to allow them to ignore it if the PGDB couldn’t pin it on me.
The hearing was a sham with the investigator not divulging over 100 photos, withholding them for two years that proved what I had said from day one, that the pipe was lowered and altered from my original installation.
These withheld photos only came to light after cross examining the police forensic expert at the hearing. He had taken the photos the day after the explosion and made them available to the investigator, but the investigator only requested a small number of the photos to support his investigators’ report.
In these withheld photos you could see the original screw holes in the wall and the pipe was running down hill. Add these withheld photos to the Allgas receipt for the other gas hose sold weeks after I left Allgas. This is the hose that caused the explosion; the hose was replaced as it had split before, due to this lowering of the pipework. This is all known to the PGDB, MP’s and the Ombudsman.
The investigator and the chair of my hearing and my old boss were all part of GANZ, (and NZIGE and other gas groups).
Remember that GANZ was the gas group that openly lobbied for deregulation and the self cert system, a system shown by the explosion to have failed. Actually the investigator wrote papers about deregulation lobbying for it, now add that to the investigator’s issuing of a full certifying license to my old boss, he was not impartial.
As part of my “rehabilitation” after the hearing I was ordered by the PGDB to do a course of instruction to uplift my license, the course didn’t exist so I was assessed. I was told by the assessor that I would be in the top 10% of gasfitters the assessor had assessed, I had not been taught anything, just assessed.
The question is……
How would the PGDB look if someone not time served and unqualified, who the PGDB had flippantly granted a full certifying gas license to and gifted credentials to empowering them to sign off gas work, who then went on to issue a gas cert for the last work at the site of an explosion caused by a gas leak, with the top original copy (which was accepted by the PGDB) was lacking any recording of a test for gas leaks?
I think the PGDB would look pretty bad (and apparently so do the PGDB)….the cover-up shows their attitude to the trade and the public’s safety….they are bound to continue this cover-up.
We now are left with the present gas “safety” cert system that has devolved even more to all new gas work being classed as low risk in a housing shortage of 60,000 homes. As all this new gas work is deemed low risk it is not required to be registered with neither the ESS nor any other government agencies, it has no hand written signed copies back up with a carbon copy honesty mechanism.
Also the PGDB I am told are still handing out gasfitting licenses to those that are deemed “acceptable” to the PGDB, but are withholding licenses to people much more deserving.
The Ombudsman being the office for Fairness for “All”, up to and including the Chief Ombudsman is happy with all of this and the Ombudsman’s “quick” response team took many years to tell me of this happiness.
There is so much more to this but believe it or not I am trying to keep it brief. I lost everything and my old boss who had just retired before the explosion sits back in his house by the beach.
And it is us lowly tradesmen that are not classed as professional….by these professionals.