Plumbers NZ is New Zealand's largest online plumbing, gas and drainage resource. Plumbing exam help, plumbing news, directory and free quotes.

Author Topic: Fellow Practitioner Issue 236 Dated 12 December 2014  (Read 232002 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Badger

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1988
  • Karma: +222/-151
Re: Fellow Practitioner Issue 236 Dated 12 December 2014
« Reply #750 on: August 16, 2017, 08:41:19 PM »
The thing is guys....and I think this is the woolly mammoth's big brother taking a giant dump in front of the flat screen tv and preventing you watching Shortland St......


When the powers that be say the problem is too big to fix...(basically they can't fix this and keep their little club going).....then they need flushing, just like the mammoth shit they have laid....

Things started to decline with deregulation in the early 90's....you have seen what happened in my case .......totally covered up and someone nearly died.....just let that sink in.....someone nearly died and they covered it up, an hour earlier a few school kids could have died on their way to school.....but these people covered it up, putting themselves and their cronies above all that, whilst framing an innocent man.....the same guy who tried to warn them about this for 6 years......



And everyone is surprised that the cowboys are on the rise.......for fuuuuuuccckkkkksssss sake are you mental.......



Mammoth bullshit like this takes years to come out.....we are just seeing the start of it, mark my words......we have zero respect shown us.....we are governed by engineers and psychiatrists.....if any of these people were any good at their own "trades" they would be practising these skills in their own fields......

We need a shadow Board to keep these cunts honest.....rough, swearing cunts to keep the dishonest cunts honest......









You can't choose who you are.....but you are the sum of your choices.......

Offline Badger

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1988
  • Karma: +222/-151
Re: Fellow Practitioner Issue 236 Dated 12 December 2014
« Reply #751 on: August 20, 2017, 07:30:29 PM »
........this article was written in 2013......do you think they listened......did they do anything about it?.....


you only have to watch the news to see how much they listened.... 4 years later.....its worse especially when you add the 60,000 shortage of homes, but its ok they got this......


Dearth of tradesmen foreseen


May 23 2013




CHRISTEL YARDLEY/Fairfax NZ

HANDS-ON TYPE: Rayden Epiha is studying fulltime for a certificate in building and construction (level 4) at Wintec.

The number of new trades trainees has dived over the past few years and some in construction are warning of a looming shortfall of skilled tradesmen.

Tertiary Education Commission figures show the number of trades trainees enrolled with industry training organisations (ITOs) dropped 23 per cent nationally - from 165,224 to 126,978 - in the three years to 2011.

Those figures have been mirrored in plummeting ITO enrolment figures and declining ITO revenue at Waikato's only technical institute, which is contracted to provide off-job training, pre-apprenticeship training and assessment.

In Wintec's 2012 annual report a "marked decline" in equivalent fulltime ITO students was identified; from a peak of 1019 in 2008 to 586 last year - a 32 per cent drop.

Wintec chief executive Mark Flowers said that was largely attributable to the recession and reflected that some industries were not taking on the same number of trainees as they were five years ago.

"ITO numbers in 2008 were at record high levels partly due to the housing boom. So if you look historically, the numbers are still quite reasonable."

However, some in the sector have pointed out possibly dire outcomes from successive years of dropping numbers.

Gayelene Woodcock, office administrator at Waikato Plumbing Services, said she believed the country would see an extreme shortage in qualified tradesmen in the next few years.

"During the early 1990s the same thing happened. When there was a decline after the 1987 crash it didn't actually affect the whole industry until the early 1990s.

"The lack of apprentices taken on there showed through about four or five years later when there was an extreme shortage of tradesmen."

Early this year the Government outlined plans to boost the number of people in apprenticeships, increasing subsidies by about $12 million from 2014 and offering the first 10,000 new apprentices and their employers who enrolled after April 1 this year money towards tools and off-job course costs.

But for some, it is too little, too late.

"We have a shortage now in skilled tradesmen. It's welcome that the Government worked out they need to do something but the impact of that skilled shortage is being seen at the moment," said Grant Robertson, Labour deputy leader and spokesperson for employment, skills and training.

"It's being seen in Christchurch and it's likely to be seen around the country."

Fletcher Waikato region manager Mark Ritchie said it was recognised a while ago that the shortage was a major issue for the industry, but several initiatives were being undertaken to try to address it.

"It is still an issue for industry, and it's quite an expense paying for apprenticeships, but you'll find most of the bigger players have continued with their regular numbers.

"A lot of the apprenticeship numbers that tend to dwindle are related to the residential side rather than the commercial sector."

Paul Hollings, head of specialist trades at New Zealand's plumbing ITO, The Skills Organisation, said that while the recession might have led to prudence among employers, the Government initiatives would improve trainee numbers.

Improved business confidence was leading to a positive outlook for trades training in the Waikato region and throughout New Zealand, he said.

'ALWAYS A PASSION'

Rayden Epiha, from Te Kauwhata, is studying fulltime for a certificate in building and construction (level 4) at Wintec.

After completing his pretrade certificate the 19-year-old hopes to secure work as a builder's apprentice.

"I've always been a hands-on person and I love the outdoors. So building stuff, even through school in carpentry classes, has been a passion of mine.

"When you build a building, you can say you have helped construct that."

Rayden said he was in a class of about 19 people and was "pretty confident" he would be able to find work.

"My dad is also a carpenter as well, so he knows builders over the Waikato and Auckland region, so he'll be able to help me out."

TUMBLING DOWN

The number of ITO trainees enrolled nationally each year between 2008 and 2011:

2008 - 165,224

2009 - 166,823

2010 - 156,586

2011 - 126,978

2012 figures being finalised

Source: Tertiary Education Commission

Offline Badger

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1988
  • Karma: +222/-151
Re: Fellow Practitioner Issue 236 Dated 12 December 2014
« Reply #752 on: August 21, 2017, 01:58:00 PM »
From: Paul & Emma Gee [mailto:gspservices@xtra.co.nz]
Sent: Monday, 21 August 2017 1:32 p.m.
To: 'jacinda.ardern@parliament.govt.nz'; 'phil.twyford@parliament.govt.nz'; 'Denise McElwain'; 'martin@pgdb.co.nz'; 'jayson@pgdb.co.nz'; 'Colleen Upton'
Cc: 'Wal Gordon'; 'lynnmoff'
Subject: Safety

 

Dear Jacinda,

 

I have copied in some others for clarity and transparency. I apologise in advance for this but if you take the time to read my email, my reasons will become apparent.

 

I understand this is a very busy time for you and am writing more from a point of view to perhaps get you or Phil or the new Building minister to look at this after the election. I have grave concerns for the Building industry as a whole and its on going affects to New Zealanders and planning for our future direction as a country.

 

You have recently and thankfully said that a new Labour Government will be a listening Government, a Government of action this will most definitely secure my vote and others around me.

 

I believe that a complaint of a cover up of a near fatal explosion carried out at an on going risk to the NZ public deserves to be listened to, before then acting to rectify the obvious problems and risks to New Zealanders in their homes and business’. Of Note this near fatal explosion happened to a nice everyday guy running a chip shop, similar to the one where you were given your first chance of work.

 

It doesn’t matter under whose watch any of this began but it most definitely needs fixing today, I say this because it appears that we have learnt nothing from issues raised like those of my case and things have sadly declined ever further since. Please see attached for an outline of the kangaroo court system and the biased premeditated persecution that my family was subjected to.

 

The short comings of the PGDB in my case are obvious. A total maladministration of the gas safety certificate system and the flippant issuing of gas licenses to cronies that resulted in the near fatal explosion, which was then covered up by the other cronies, with me as the scapegoat.

 

The PGDB still refuse to clear my name even though by their own reckoning I have done no wrong, please call me on this I have evidence aplenty.  I am a very experienced gasfitter but have been corruptly hounded out of my chosen profession of 25 years, in a dire shortage of experienced gasfitters.

 

Sadly since my case there has been a further decline in safety with the crazy notion to class all new installations of gasfitting work as low risk….and by reason of this low risk classification none of this new work is required to be registered anywhere, other than with the installer (apparently a shoe box under the bed would suffice). As far as I am aware none of this new work is audited. If this has changed please can those copied in let me know?

 

This raises a few questions……

 

If this new work goes unaudited how will we know the quality/safety level of this new work?

 

If any of this new, low risk gas work is to be checked or audited….. How would you know where to look? Would you ask the gasfitter to pick a job for auditing? Would he only pick his best work? Are those doing this new work experienced?

 

Let me be very clear any new work done incorrectly, even the smallest job can go horribly wrong.

 

Now bear in mind this “new work, low risk” system is being utilised in a skills/experience/supervisor shortage…. all done under the immense pressure of a lack of 60,000 homes.

 

The only measure available to us that I can see is by the damage done, after that damage is done. Again to those copied in please correct me if I am wrong.

 

I think deregulation was a mistake, but even deregulation initially gave us a self certifying gas system with unique gas safety certificates (certs) sold by books identified by a unique cert number for each cert, sold to a specific licence holder identified by his unique license number, it was traceable and it was audited.

 

These unique certs had a triple carbon copy of the original handwritten pink top copy; this top copy was then held by the PGDB. With the subsequent carbon copies then held separately and independently by the gas supplier, the gasfitter and the customer. These four independent document depositories was an effective honesty mechanism with a handwritten, verifiable and traceable way of filling in the unique cert, with a real signature done by hand. But even this has all gone now. Of note it was this honestly mechanism that showed the shortcomings of the PGDB’s administration of the safety cert system.

 

This present day classification of all new gas work as low risk is an ill informed move in its own right, but to do it in a time period where there is a huge shortage of experienced gasfitters …….and add to that it being done in a housing shortage of 60,000 homes is nothing short of insane. We are installing the problems of tomorrow, today……and sadly doing it knowingly.

 

The Building industry is doing it hard and its not the tradesman’s fault. The answer is not to brush any of this under the carpet; no one ever learns from “addressing” it in this way, it will just make for trip hazards in the future.

 

For example look at the leaky homes.

 

The leaky home fiasco caused a kneejerk reaction to go and license the builders and get them to self certify their building work, for 25 years I am told (I really feel for them in this).

 

From my point of view when this happened the people who should have bore most of the blame (those in product sales/promotion, building design and regulation (actually deregulation) did not suffer any……so a system was sort to lay blame if it happens again, but only after it happens again. All put on the tradesman, we are apparently the whipping boy for all the shortcomings of the professionals.

 

For example one of the solutions to these leaky homes is to use treated timber (you really should look up the chemical compounds used in this treatment of timber). The treated timber is used so that if/when the building leaks it doesn’t rot (well not so quickly)……we are putting these chemicals in our homes (not to mention in the lungs of our tradies who work drilling and sawing it).

 

The old tried and trusted methods of building with proper flashings, extended eaves and external guttering to name but a few make the old houses so sound it’s a testament to our predecessors. We should be looking toward these older guys more than to the modern designers that have a “vision” and want an upside down roof, with an internal gutter, minimalist eaves if any, all with walls made of a few mm of plaster over polystyrene sheets.

 

Most tradesmen, but not all, are committed to quality and safety……there are a “cowboy few”… a dirty dozen if you will, and there always will be, who will put profit before quality and safety. But this number is growing.

 

This “cowboy few” will grow as more people get away with it. The self regulation/certifying system, just as evidenced with the gas system, empower cowboys and disadvantage the honest.

 

The PGDB recently admitted the number of cowboys is on the rise……if this is so, then this system above is already failing badly. Please see attached news article for PGDB’s own opinion.

 

Is this the system in this attached news article that we want or need? Because this is what we are setting up for the future…..a two tier system of shoddy even dangerous initial work done in people’s HOMES, first done by the cowboys (who incidentally pocket most of the profit by the way and are more likely to survive financially)….. which is then repaired by the few licensed tradesman left? Of note these experienced few are leaving and /or retiring because they are either fed up of it or going out of business.

 

This two tier system is done at a cost to the average home owner that is huge, it is double dipping at its worst, not to mention the risk to their health and safety…..where will we be in tens years time with the decline in numbers of the jaded experienced guys?

 

I have also read that a worrying amount of the building repairs done at the sites of the recent earthquakes and floods are being flagged as substandard and need redoing. Again a two tier system of ever growing costs, not just to owners but to government and insurance companies, not to mention the sanity and feelings of the poor occupiers.

 

The old system worked much better, i.e. proper regulation with proper apprenticeships overseen by audits/inspections and decent understandable clear concise industry standards, written in plain English.

 

Of note: My old boss was gifted his full certifying license with no apprenticeship….most, if not all the evidence points to him, he even had previous form….but gets away with a near fatal explosion, even after facing a charge but this charge conveniently disappears……what message does this send to his cronies, or any other potential cowboys thinking of doing the same?

 

Impunity leads to corruption which leads to profit put before safety.

 

Connected people will always tend to act with impunity, that’s why they invest in their connections and cronyism…..it’s a protection against prosecution. When this is in place and is shown to work as it did in my case……it empowers these people (and their mates) to act detrimentally to the public, putting profit before repercussions ( this is a bad joke because there are little to no repercussions and the profits are huge). We are yet to see the problems of the future…..the ambulance at the bottom of the cliff is being replaced with a hearse, that’s if this hasn’t already happened.

 

It’s the job of regulation, i.e. Government… to keep the trades and their Governing Boards honest, most will be happy to comply and would do the right thing anyway, but there will always be those that don’t.

 

When you run a business the cost/profit margin is always weighed against the work undertaken and how it is carried out and this will always be a massive consideration. When times are hard even the most conscientious tradesman may sacrifice some of his commitments to quality even safety………..especially when faced with going under.

 

In putting others needs before your self……the temptation is huge. I am speaking from experience as I have been there…..I lost my whole business due to the unfounded and unwarranted actions of the PGDB but folded before I put profit before quality and others safety. The temptation was huge because I wanted to be with my family and not be forced to work away from them just so we could eat; my boys were 3 and 5 at the time. I will never get those years back.

 

The well meaning conscientious tradesman will comply but under an ever increasing burgeoning cost…..the cowboys never adhere to these costs. You see the cowboys charge just a fraction less, undercutting the honest…..but in doing so make a much much greater profit. It is a mess.

 

You only find out after it has gone wrong and by then these cowboys have filled their pockets and moved on …..and maybe they are connected enough to get away with nearly killing someone and paying a nominal fee of a few thousand dollars……..what message does this send to others who consider this avenue of small to no repercussions whilst making a huge profit? It is a wild west of Cowboys and Idiots.

 

The trades have been very badly run and disorganised since deregulation. We are now lacking numbers due to profit put before apprenticeships (don’t get me started on the ITO’s history) and added to this we are loosing the much needed experience in the industry due to the attrition of compliance fatigue, age and financial pressure. When these older guys are gone we are frankly screwed with a very hard journey to even get back to where we are now.

 

And so in answer to these shortages we are calling for a flood of as many apprentices as we can muster whilst allowing ever more “skilled” people into the country to fill positions to build this shortage of homes and fill our depleted ranks.

 

What if we over shoot in these numbers (which we will) and cause the “housing bubble” to burst, not just within the building industry but within the housing market as a whole…….this could easily happen when all this extra work is done and we have a glut of tradesman…… and inevitably a glut of houses. Businesses will start to fold in a housing crash and the dog eats dog competition kicks in….. will people then put profit before safety?…..after what we have told them what is ok in the past…….its a no brainer. How bad do we want to make the outlook for our kids?

 

Why do we not plan for our future, isn’t it is our kid’s world that we build? I find it totally bizarre and deeply disappointing that apparently the greedy cronies filling their pockets at the trough in the short term, putting profit even convenience before our future is ok?

 

I hope you are going to lead a Government that will ask the hard questions but even more importantly come up with the even harder answers that are inconvenient to the cronies with their noses in the trough.

 

Michael Cullen started in the right place, but it inevitably failed because the PGDB were then re-filled with the same type of people that were sacked. And since been populated with people happy to cover this up, it isn’t going in the right direction……Even the PGDB say that cowboys are on the rise. Experienced people are dropping off the other end……what do think will happen if this trajectory is allowed to continue? There is an opportunity here for a better direction.

 

I am happy to answer any queries, even to travel anywhere in NZ and bring with me a wealth of information. Perhaps we could meet at the PGDB offices in Wellington?

 

I am happy to wait until after the election but please Jacinda, or someone at your office, can you please read the attached documents and can you acknowledge receipt of this email?

 

Yours With Integrity Paul Gee.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Offline Badger

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1988
  • Karma: +222/-151
Re: Fellow Practitioner Issue 236 Dated 12 December 2014
« Reply #753 on: August 21, 2017, 01:58:56 PM »
Mark my words the massive problems of tomorrow are being sown today......


Offline Badger

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1988
  • Karma: +222/-151
Re: Fellow Practitioner Issue 236 Dated 12 December 2014
« Reply #754 on: August 23, 2017, 09:30:46 AM »
I been out of the game now for some years..... since being framed for something I did not do, something I actually tried warning about it..... before the explosion for 6 years.....so I am a bit out of touch....but....can you please tell me if this below is true....


All new gas installs don't require to be registered in any independent register of work, this so called "low risk" gas work is not being audited......

This is happening in a climate of low numbers of gas experience and supervision.....

Not to forget its being done in a real push to catch up with a shortage of 60,000 houses........

Oh and on top of that there is a increase of cowboys....(I wonder why?  *)........

All this is being policed by people who are happy to turn a blind eye to a cover up of a near fatal explosion, letting the guilty walk free at the expense of the innocent....





* I wonder why people think they can get away with being a cowboy.....perhaps it is because there is a very limited way of checking work, even finding where it is...let alone the standard of the work........UNTIL IT GOES WRONG.....

Offline Badger

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1988
  • Karma: +222/-151
Re: Fellow Practitioner Issue 236 Dated 12 December 2014
« Reply #755 on: August 23, 2017, 10:02:35 AM »



From: Paul & Emma Gee [mailto:gspservices@xtra.co.nz]
Sent: Wednesday, 23 August 2017 9:59 a.m.
To: 'Paul & Emma Gee'; jacinda.ardern@parliament.govt.nz; phil.twyford@parliament.govt.nz; 'Denise McElwain'; martin@pgdb.co.nz; jayson@pgdb.co.nz; 'Colleen Upton'
Cc: 'Wal Gordon'; 'lynnmoff'
Subject: RE: Safety

 

To All Copied  In

 

 

 

Please see below in blue a recent post on a Plumbers forum, it has in excess of 59 thousand views, link below.

 

 

Please can you point out anything that isn’t true in this post…..

 

If it is true, which I believe it is, please can you explain to me how this serves to protect the NZ Public and the integrity of the trade? How does it help?

 

My case highlighted some very serious malpractice both by members of the PGDB and the real guilty person still being protected by the PGDB…..(someone nearly died for Christ sake).

 

What was highlighted by my case was bad….. but the solution offered is even worse, you wonder why cowboys are on the rise? You wonder why the standard of work is in free fall? You wonder why there is a shortage of tradesman?

 

Also on this link below is a story from 2013 about the “dearth of tradesman” this was FOUR bloody years ago…..but it appears little to nothing has been done……..we are in a mess…a dangerous mess.

 

 


All new gas installs don't require to be registered in any independent register of work, this so called "low risk" gas work is not being audited......

This is happening in a climate of low numbers of gas experience and supervision.....

Not to forget its being done in a real push to catch up with a shortage of 60,000 houses........

Oh and on top of that there is a increase of cowboys....(I wonder why?  *)........

All this is being policed by people who are happy to turn a blind eye to a cover up of a near fatal explosion, letting the guilty walk free at the expense of the innocent....


* I wonder why people think they can get away with being a cowboy.....perhaps it is because there is a very limited way of checking work, even finding where it is...let alone the standard of the work........UNTIL IT GOES WRONG.....

 

 

https://www.plumbers.co.nz/forum/fellow-practitioners-update/41/fellow-practitioner-issue-236-dated-12-december-2014/1810/msg11057#msg11057

 

 

In this shortage of tradesman Martin Sawyers why won’t you clear my name?

 

 

Yours With Integrity Paul Gee

 


Offline Badger

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1988
  • Karma: +222/-151
Re: Fellow Practitioner Issue 236 Dated 12 December 2014
« Reply #756 on: September 21, 2017, 09:00:57 PM »
I feel for this poor guy, I have no idea of his problems or his causes.....but I do understand how you can feel so low and so helpless, poor bugger






http://www.msn.com/en-nz/news/national/person-sets-fire-to-themselves-at-parliament/ar-AAshxGM?li=AAaUOAg&ocid=ientp

Offline Watchdog

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 214
  • Karma: +27/-1
  • Plumber gasfitter and drainlayer
Re: Fellow Practitioner Issue 236 Dated 12 December 2014
« Reply #757 on: September 22, 2017, 06:01:06 AM »
This is not the first time aggrieved people have protested on that sport.  It is the exact same spot that Wal Gordon sat on a toilet pan for three days protesting the plight of the Plumbing Gasfitting and Drainlaying industry and got no response from the Government and that response continues today. Possibly another injustice. My thoughts go out to the guy.  No polices or actions by the Government or their departments should drive people to such self harm.

Offline Badger

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1988
  • Karma: +222/-151
Re: Fellow Practitioner Issue 236 Dated 12 December 2014
« Reply #758 on: November 03, 2017, 07:26:32 AM »
Some definitions of some words......apply them to the emails and the attachment.......how can I say these things with out repercussion....ah that would be because it is true....and I have a lot of evidence........






Corrupt

adjective

Having or showing a willingness to act dishonestly in return for money or personal gain.

‘unscrupulous logging companies assisted by corrupt officials’

Evil or morally depraved.

 ‘the old corrupt order’




Integrity......
noun

1The quality of being honest and having strong moral principles.
‘a gentleman of complete integrity’

The condition of being unified or sound in construction.






From: Paul & Emma Gee [mailto:gspservices@xtra.co.nz]
Sent: Wednesday, 1 November 2017 10:17 a.m.
To: 'martin@pgdb.co.nz'
Cc: 'Wal Gordon'; 'Colleen Upton'; 'Rt. Hon. Winston Peters'; 'Denise McElwain'; 'jacinda.ardern@parliament.govt.nz'
Subject: RE: A cover up at a risk to the NZ Public

 

Hi Martin,

 

You would have had time to read my email sent Fri 20/10/2017 7:04 a.m. with the file attached, attached here again for your convenience and to give this email stream some context and clarity, also see the email below.

 

I also would ask that you table this attached document that has been in your possession now for some time at the next PGDB meeting. I would ask each and every PGDB member to pass comment on this “Brief History” or at the very least confirm that they have read it.

 

I say brief because I have edited it down some what, there (as you are fully aware) is a much bigger picture in the failings of the PGDB’s mal administering of the gas safety certificate system uncovered by my witch-hunt, not forgetting the flippant issuing of licenses to people favourable to the PGDB, whilst withholding licenses to more deserving people.

 

I would ask all of you copied in if covering up this fiasco….. at a very real risk to the NZ public is helpful or even legal. The PGDB have exhausted my funds and caused me a huge amount of undue stress, they have terrorised my wife and had a detrimental effect on my life, business and reputation. Is this fair?

 

I have tried my hardest to act with in the law and it has failed me, but also the people of NZ when seen in the context of my case with regards to the on going safety of gas in their homes. It is countrywide.

 

The PGDB talk of regaining trust within the industry and re-establishing the integrity lost over the last decade…..I assure you brushing this under the carpet will achieve neither.

 

I have only the truth on my side.

 

The PGDB often give us lowly tradesman the option of “coming clean” when they have made mistakes to avoid undue court costs, the PGDB publically talk of the importance of the NZ publics safety, pontificating about high work standards, abiding by the rules for the greater good, about protecting reputations and building relationships…..but the PGDB only do all of this when addressing others…..the PGDB do this while you ignore your own standards in your actions. This makes you one of the worst hypocrites there are…..self centred, blind in your own power hypocrites……that do a they please endangering others as you go.

 

You may need to look up integrity as I feel you have absolutely no idea what it is.

 

 

 

Please call me on my allegations because the in excess of 300 documents prove what I claim.

 

 

 

There is a very real danger to the NZ public which has come about under the PGDB’s watch and mal-administration of their charges of safety and administration. It has been run like a gentleman’s club that sadly lacks any gentleman.

 

Ask the PGDB about the mal-administration of the so called (and very ironically) gas SAFETY certificate system….that carried a disclaimer for accuracy…. until updated and edited by today’s present watch.

 

All this previous work is still out there…..with the now added bonus of all “new” gas work being deemed “low” risk and requiring no independent registering of that work anywhere other than with the tradesman who is installing the work, all this work not independently audited……please see attachment for extent of this failure to protect against those unscrupulous gasfitters that would turn a blind eye to their own work to allow them to make money……all done in a housing shortage of 60,000 homes…..the ambulance at the bottom of the cliff has been replaced by a hearse…..the avoidable decline in the industry over the last decade is deplorable and down right dangerous.

 

Yours with Integrity Paul Gee.

 

 


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: Paul & Emma Gee [mailto:gspservices@xtra.co.nz]
Sent: Friday, 20 October 2017 7:04 a.m.
To: 'martin@pgdb.co.nz'
Cc: 'Wal Gordon'; 'Rt. Hon. Winston Peters'
Subject: A cover up at a risk to the NZ Public

 

Martin,

 

I want to ensure you are totally aware of my version of events and ask you to correct anything that is untrue in this statement attached. If it is true, as I am 100% sure it is…..how does this help protect the NZ public?

 

Thank you

 

Paul Gee

Offline Badger

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1988
  • Karma: +222/-151
Re: Fellow Practitioner Issue 236 Dated 12 December 2014
« Reply #759 on: November 03, 2017, 07:45:45 AM »
From: Paul & Emma Gee [mailto:gspservices@xtra.co.nz]
Sent: Friday, 3 November 2017 7:43 a.m.
To: martin@pgdb.co.nz
Cc: 'Wal Gordon'
Subject: Plumbers forum

Martin,

Please see below a post that you can find on the link below.

So you are aware this email will also be posted on the same thread. I do this so that the industry, or at least some of the industry (this thread has over 60,000 views) can judge your reply, which will also be posted on this thread. To ignore it (as I guess you will) shows a total disregard for the integrity of the position and that of the PGDB, in my opinion.

I want you to show the industry what you think of corruption and integrity; I have copied some definitions from the oxford dictionary for your convenience.

Corruption does not have a sell by date and integrity doesn’t come free with the position of CEO……nor does it come free as a PGDB advertising promo in any cereal packets. Integrity is hard earned.

Yours with Integrity Paul Gee



https://www.plumbers.co.nz/forum/fellow-practitioners-update/41/fellow-practitioner-issue-236-dated-12-december-2014/1810/msg11117#msg11117 

Some definitions of some words......apply them to the emails and the attachment.......how can I say these things with out repercussion....ah that would be because it is true....and I have a lot of evidence........

Corrupt

adjective

Having or showing a willingness to act dishonestly in return for money or personal gain.

‘unscrupulous logging companies assisted by corrupt officials’

Evil or morally depraved.

 ‘the old corrupt order’


Integrity......
noun

1The quality of being honest and having strong moral principles.
‘a gentleman of complete integrity’

The condition of being unified or sound in construction.






From: Paul & Emma Gee [mailto:gspservices@xtra.co.nz]
Sent: Wednesday, 1 November 2017 10:17 a.m.
To: 'martin@pgdb.co.nz'
Cc: 'Wal Gordon'; 'Colleen Upton'; 'Rt. Hon. Winston Peters'; 'Denise McElwain'; 'jacinda.ardern@parliament.govt.nz'
Subject: RE: A cover up at a risk to the NZ Public

 

Hi Martin,

 

You would have had time to read my email sent Fri 20/10/2017 7:04 a.m. with the file attached, attached here again for your convenience and to give this email stream some context and clarity, also see the email below.

 

I also would ask that you table this attached document that has been in your possession now for some time at the next PGDB meeting. I would ask each and every PGDB member to pass comment on this “Brief History” or at the very least confirm that they have read it.

 

I say brief because I have edited it down some what, there (as you are fully aware) is a much bigger picture in the failings of the PGDB’s mal administering of the gas safety certificate system uncovered by my witch-hunt, not forgetting the flippant issuing of licenses to people favourable to the PGDB, whilst withholding licenses to more deserving people.

 

I would ask all of you copied in if covering up this fiasco….. at a very real risk to the NZ public is helpful or even legal. The PGDB have exhausted my funds and caused me a huge amount of undue stress, they have terrorised my wife and had a detrimental effect on my life, business and reputation. Is this fair?

 

I have tried my hardest to act with in the law and it has failed me, but also the people of NZ when seen in the context of my case with regards to the on going safety of gas in their homes. It is countrywide.

 

The PGDB talk of regaining trust within the industry and re-establishing the integrity lost over the last decade…..I assure you brushing this under the carpet will achieve neither.

 

I have only the truth on my side.

 

The PGDB often give us lowly tradesman the option of “coming clean” when they have made mistakes to avoid undue court costs, the PGDB publically talk of the importance of the NZ publics safety, pontificating about high work standards, abiding by the rules for the greater good, about protecting reputations and building relationships…..but the PGDB only do all of this when addressing others…..the PGDB do this while you ignore your own standards in your actions. This makes you one of the worst hypocrites there are…..self centred, blind in your own power hypocrites……that do a they please endangering others as you go.

 

You may need to look up integrity as I feel you have absolutely no idea what it is.

 

 

 

Please call me on my allegations because the in excess of 300 documents prove what I claim.

 

 

 

There is a very real danger to the NZ public which has come about under the PGDB’s watch and mal-administration of their charges of safety and administration. It has been run like a gentleman’s club that sadly lacks any gentleman.

 

Ask the PGDB about the mal-administration of the so called (and very ironically) gas SAFETY certificate system….that carried a disclaimer for accuracy…. until updated and edited by today’s present watch.

 

All this previous work is still out there…..with the now added bonus of all “new” gas work being deemed “low” risk and requiring no independent registering of that work anywhere other than with the tradesman who is installing the work, all this work not independently audited……please see attachment for extent of this failure to protect against those unscrupulous gasfitters that would turn a blind eye to their own work to allow them to make money……all done in a housing shortage of 60,000 homes…..the ambulance at the bottom of the cliff has been replaced by a hearse…..the avoidable decline in the industry over the last decade is deplorable and down right dangerous.

 

Yours with Integrity Paul Gee.

 

 


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: Paul & Emma Gee [mailto:gspservices@xtra.co.nz]
Sent: Friday, 20 October 2017 7:04 a.m.
To: 'martin@pgdb.co.nz'
Cc: 'Wal Gordon'; 'Rt. Hon. Winston Peters'
Subject: A cover up at a risk to the NZ Public

 

Martin,

 

I want to ensure you are totally aware of my version of events and ask you to correct anything that is untrue in this statement attached. If it is true, as I am 100% sure it is…..how does this help protect the NZ public?

 

Thank you

 

Paul Gee
  2017 07 02 Brief history..doc


Offline Badger

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1988
  • Karma: +222/-151
Re: Fellow Practitioner Issue 236 Dated 12 December 2014
« Reply #760 on: November 03, 2017, 07:53:56 AM »
The truth has integrity and should be aspired to.......to cover up corruption (basically telling fibs) means you are tainted by that corruption and should be shunned.............corruption lacks any integrity.....

I might be wrong (I am just a mere plumber and not a learned "professional") but that's my take on it...........

Simple question Martin Sawyers CEO of the PGDB and all the PGDB members.......was my case handled with integrity? A simple yes or no.......no double speak......read the attachment below.....you decide!

 

Offline Badger

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1988
  • Karma: +222/-151
Re: Fellow Practitioner Issue 236 Dated 12 December 2014
« Reply #761 on: November 05, 2017, 12:22:12 PM »
Sent on the 5th November......about an explosion......oh the irony!!!!





From: Paul & Emma Gee [mailto:gspservices@xtra.co.nz]
Sent: Sunday, 5 November 2017 12:18 p.m.
To: 'martin@pgdb.co.nz'
Cc: 'Wal Gordon'; 'Colleen Upton'; 'Rt. Hon. Winston Peters'; 'jacinda.ardern@parliament.govt.nz'; 'jenny.salesa@parliament.govt.nz'
Subject:

Martin,


I could not have been responsible for the explosion that nearly killed Ron Clarke. Some of the undeniable facts are listed below; I say some because there is a massive amount of evidence in my possession.



1.   I worked at Allgas from 24th Feb to 2nd Dec 2003, see attached letter “period of employment”. Leaving because of John Darnley’s blasé and dangerous attitude to the safety of his customers.

2.   The hose that caused the explosion was sold 21st Jan 2004 (some 50 days after my last day at Allgas), see attached receipt for a third hose sold to supply just 2 gas deep fat fryers. This is the hose that split after being bent and stressing against the floor after someone lowered my original pipe work. This lowering is evidenced in the withheld photos (with held by the PGDB’s investigator) that showed where I had originally fitted my pipe work; it is shown by the holes left by my original fixings and the declining angle of the lowered pipe.

3.   The job card for the Milton street chipshop, the site of the explosion, shows two people’s handwriting, mine and some one who ADDED the fryers to my original pre-pipe job card and in all probability to the actual job. Please see handwriting samples and opinions attached. This is the same John Darnley who faced a charge for the explosion, but this charge disappeared before his hearing, how does this happen? Most if not all of this evidence was and is still available to the PGDB and its investigator. I actually received most of the evidence from the PGDB.

4.   This added writing of the fryers when compared to the signed sample of John Darnley writing appears to be John Darnley’s writing, the owner/manager of Allgas. This is the same John Darnley gifted his full certifying license many years before by Tony Hammond. This is the same Tony Hammond who was later appointed by the PGDB to investigate the explosion in the face of my complaints of impartiality. The same Tony Hammond who ignored evidence and withheld over 100 scene photographs of the explosion that proved my innocence. These photos only becoming available on cross examination by Wal Gordon at the hearing from the police’s forensic investigator, Hammond never making these photos available to us.

5.   The basis for my one last charge (out of 44), that the PGDB still cling to, was later ignored in another case. The substance of this last charge is based totally on the sole opinion of the conflicted Tony Hammond. This last charge was the enforcement of a non mandatory part of the regulations. Even the investigator said if no fumes were entering the building then it complied with the mandatory part of the regs. The owner of the dwelling said fumes had never entered his home. But the other case ignored by the PGDB, where the elderly couple had actually complained specifically about fumes entering their home, were told to “just close the window when you use the water heater”. Is this fair, does it embrace integrity or corruption….which?…….. because it can’t be both.

6.   The certificate mentioned by number 345168 in the Dept of Labour complaint for the explosion, the sole basis for the investigation. This certificate totally in the name of John Darnley, issued years after I left Allgas. This certificate claimed by the PGDB to have never been received by them, even though an electronic copy appears on the PGDB’s Fox Pro gas certificate system, with all the same information present. Same address, same appliance, same cert number….AND SAME MISSING TEST FOR GAS LEAKS. But the investigator claims to have seen the original copy of cert 345138. The PGDB told the explosion victim’s lawyer that this cert was never received by the PGDB……they did this while the poor man lay in a drug induced coma in a burns unit, he lay there for two weeks…..is this fair?



I ask you Martin, was this a fair process that the burns victim and I was subjected to? No one has been held responsible for the explosion while ignoring blatant evidence. Does this show integrity?


Is the New Zealand public’s safety best served by this total disregard of the facts? What precedent does it set for the future? (This is hugely important and should not be underestimated).


Is it fair to persecute the innocent whilst protecting the guilty? Would this not be corruption?




Please clear my name and hold the guilty responsible. Don’t forget I tried for 6 years before the explosion to fix this, notifying the PGDB of dodgy gas certs covering altered dangerous work, specifically naming Darnley in my concerns. My warnings could not have been better crafted, especially when viewed in the perspective of the DOL complaint.

I am sick of being known as “the guy who blew up the chipshop” ….when I know all these facts, it is harrowing and very draining to keep explaining to people what actually happened……but I always will explain. I am totally innocent.



Please table this email and attached evidence at the same PGDB Board meeting as my previous email. Be assured I will not rest until my name is cleared, every new person who joins the vicinity of my case, new MP or new member of the PGDB will be told my story until one of integrity is found. I swear this on all that is sacred to me.



Yours with Integrity Paul Gee.

Offline Badger

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1988
  • Karma: +222/-151
Re: Fellow Practitioner Issue 236 Dated 12 December 2014
« Reply #762 on: November 05, 2017, 01:36:09 PM »
So you can all see the mettle of this PGDB.......How will they act.....will Martin Sawyers refuse to show the PGDB this evidence or will they willingly accept it all......or will they stand for the truth and integrity? How they act can give you all a good indication of what they are.....

When these documents are tabled and they see this state of affairs they should be appalled and want this addressed.....you see anyone who joins a continuous membership Board inherits the actions of those who went before them.......

The PGDB a few years back celebrated 100 years of existence, not its 100th new member nor its 100th incarnation.....but its 100th year of being.....

The present PGDB should ask themselves how would your predecessors and your future members view this ignoring of blatant evidence, protecting the guilty and persecuting the innocent?

Offline Badger

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1988
  • Karma: +222/-151
Re: Fellow Practitioner Issue 236 Dated 12 December 2014
« Reply #763 on: November 05, 2017, 05:59:59 PM »
The email I sent below, I forwarded to every email address listed on the PGDB website along with the attachments....so you can be sure it is common knowledge across the PGDB.

See below....



From: Paul & Emma Gee [mailto:gspservices@xtra.co.nz]
Sent: Sunday, 5 November 2017 2:03 p.m.
To: 'ceo@pgdb.co.nz'; 'Registrar'; 'licensing'; 'gascerts@pgdb.co.nz'; 'exams@pgdb.co.nz'; 'PGDB Competency Based Licensing'; 'accounts@pgdb.co.nz'; 'complaints@pgdb.co.nz'; 'overseas@pgdb.co.nz'; 'comms@pgdb.co.nz'; 'martin@pgdb.co.nz'
Cc: 'Wal Gordon'; 'Colleen Upton'
Subject: Cover up

Dear PGDB,

Can those copied in please ensure this gets tabled under general business at the next PGDB meeting (also the other emails sent to Martin Sawyers); I will look for it in the PGDB minutes posted on your website, if you do not table it please can you let me know why.

Please can you ask that every Board Member comments on it or at the very least confirm that he/she has read it?

Thank you for your time

Paul Gee

________________________________________
From: Paul & Emma Gee [mailto:gspservices@xtra.co.nz]
Sent: Sunday, 5 November 2017 12:18 p.m.
To: 'martin@pgdb.co.nz'
Cc: 'Wal Gordon'; 'Colleen Upton'; 'Rt. Hon. Winston Peters'; 'jacinda.ardern@parliament.govt.nz'; 'jenny.salesa@parliament.govt.nz'
Subject:

Martin,


I could not have been responsible for the explosion that nearly killed Ron Clarke. Some of the undeniable facts are listed below; I say some because there is a massive amount of evidence in my possession.



1.   I worked at Allgas from 24th Feb to 2nd Dec 2003, see attached letter “period of employment”. Leaving because of John Darnley’s blasé and dangerous attitude to the safety of his customers.

2.   The hose that caused the explosion was sold 21st Jan 2004 (some 50 days after my last day at Allgas), see attached receipt for a third hose sold to supply just 2 gas deep fat fryers. This is the hose that split after being bent and stressing against the floor after someone lowered my original pipe work. This lowering is evidenced in the withheld photos (with held by the PGDB’s investigator) that showed where I had originally fitted my pipe work; it is shown by the holes left by my original fixings and the declining angle of the lowered pipe.

3.   The job card for the Milton street chipshop, the site of the explosion, shows two people’s handwriting, mine and some one who ADDED the fryers to my original pre-pipe job card and in all probability to the actual job. Please see handwriting samples and opinions attached. This is the same John Darnley who faced a charge for the explosion, but this charge disappeared before his hearing, how does this happen? Most if not all of this evidence was and is still available to the PGDB and its investigator. I actually received most of the evidence from the PGDB.

4.   This added writing of the fryers when compared to the signed sample of John Darnley writing appears to be John Darnley’s writing, the owner/manager of Allgas. This is the same John Darnley gifted his full certifying license many years before by Tony Hammond. This is the same Tony Hammond who was later appointed by the PGDB to investigate the explosion in the face of my complaints of impartiality. The same Tony Hammond who ignored evidence and withheld over 100 scene photographs of the explosion that proved my innocence. These photos only becoming available on cross examination by Wal Gordon at the hearing from the police’s forensic investigator, Hammond never making these photos available to us.

5.   The basis for my one last charge (out of 44), that the PGDB still cling to, was later ignored in another case. The substance of this last charge is based totally on the sole opinion of the conflicted Tony Hammond. This last charge was the enforcement of a non mandatory part of the regulations. Even the investigator said if no fumes were entering the building then it complied with the mandatory part of the regs. The owner of the dwelling said fumes had never entered his home. But the other case ignored by the PGDB, where the elderly couple had actually complained specifically about fumes entering their home, were told to “just close the window when you use the water heater”. Is this fair, does it embrace integrity or corruption….which?…….. because it can’t be both.

6.   The certificate mentioned by number 345168 in the Dept of Labour complaint for the explosion, the sole basis for the investigation. This certificate totally in the name of John Darnley, issued years after I left Allgas. This certificate claimed by the PGDB to have never been received by them, even though an electronic copy appears on the PGDB’s Fox Pro gas certificate system, with all the same information present. Same address, same appliance, same cert number….AND SAME MISSING TEST FOR GAS LEAKS. But the investigator claims to have seen the original copy of cert 345138. The PGDB told the explosion victim’s lawyer that this cert was never received by the PGDB……they did this while the poor man lay in a drug induced coma in a burns unit, he lay there for two weeks…..is this fair?



I ask you Martin, was this a fair process that the burns victim and I was subjected to? No one has been held responsible for the explosion while ignoring blatant evidence. Does this show integrity?


Is the New Zealand public’s safety best served by this total disregard of the facts? What precedent does it set for the future? (This is hugely important and should not be underestimated).


Is it fair to persecute the innocent whilst protecting the guilty? Would this not be corruption?




Please clear my name and hold the guilty responsible. Don’t forget I tried for 6 years before the explosion to fix this, notifying the PGDB of dodgy gas certs covering altered dangerous work, specifically naming Darnley in my concerns. My warnings could not have been better crafted, especially when viewed in the perspective of the DOL complaint.

I am sick of being known as “the guy who blew up the chipshop” ….when I know all these facts, it is harrowing and very draining to keep explaining to people what actually happened……but I always will explain. I am totally innocent.



Please table this email and attached evidence at the same PGDB Board meeting as my previous email. Be assured I will not rest until my name is cleared, every new person who joins the vicinity of my case, new MP or new member of the PGDB will be told my story until one of integrity is found. I swear this on all that is sacred to me.



Yours with Integrity Paul Gee.




How does this sort of cover up sit with you guys? How does it help the industry? What precedent does it set for the future?

Please see attachments sent with email.


Offline Badger

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1988
  • Karma: +222/-151
Re: Fellow Practitioner Issue 236 Dated 12 December 2014
« Reply #764 on: November 07, 2017, 09:11:26 PM »
Think on this...... the PGDB and numerous people in charge, know you know all this.... but don't seem to care that you can see how blatantly dodgy all this is.......

I believe it says a lot about their attitude toward you and your trade and how you can assume you will be treated should you fall foul of them......



FFS.....A guy nearly got killed and they are covering it up and not going after the guy who most if not all the evidence points to.....really? Oh wait there they gifted him his full license with no apprenticeship sat......respect for our trade, I struggle to see anything other than contempt for us.



Does anyone remember the old kids story about the Emperor's new clothes?


Next time the PGDB make a press release or swagger into a meeting and swish their imagined sparkly new robe of plumbing excellence and openly boast of safety....about standards of work.....about fairness and integrity...... about saving the good people of NZ, keeping them safe from dodgy cowboys and ruffians.....

You can either say "those new clothes really suit you Emperor"........ as you look straight at their sickly, pasty and pock marked figures trying not to make eye contact with their bare body of dodgy dealings and cover ups...........(I am talking figuratively about their body of work not their actual physiques).

Or you can tell them that the Emperor's New Clothes are non existent and you can see their bare bum (and it ain't a nice one either). Delusional springs to mind, that and just plain dodgy hypocrisy.




Share via digg Share via facebook Share via linkedin Share via twitter

Similar Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies / Views Last post
clip
Fellow Practitioner Issue 235 Dated 5 December 2014

Started by Wal

5 Replies
2939 Views
Last post December 10, 2014, 09:43:07 AM
by Jaxcat
clip
Fellow Practitioner Issue 184 Dated 6 December 2013

Started by Wal

2 Replies
2482 Views
Last post December 06, 2013, 02:13:52 PM
by Jaxcat
clip
Fellow Practitioner Issue 185 Dated 13 December 2013

Started by Wal

5 Replies
3057 Views
Last post December 13, 2013, 04:01:14 PM
by robbo
clip
Fellow Practitioner Issue 186 Dated 20 December 2013

Started by Wal

1 Replies
1730 Views
Last post December 23, 2013, 06:39:28 AM
by Watchdog
 
Share this topic...
In a forum
(BBCode)
In a site/blog
(HTML)