Also see attached page two,
I am told I made the statement that I referred to my self as just a plumber, the Board can't show me where I said this....I have an email from a Board lawyer saying it was an amalgamation of 4 comments, but when you read these comments it is blatant that when read IN CONTEXT I am referring to being an employee, i.e. following the direction of my boss (as we all do), the same boss who got away with being charged with the exploding chip shop, because the charge disappeared without any trial or hearing....I can show the connections that this man has.
Next is the course of instruction....it didn't exist, I did an ASSESSMENT instead, i.e. assessed on my knowledge already known by me, I was taught nothing new (I am sure the assessor could have taught me a lot, he knew his shit, but it was not was called for by the Board), I did it with my arm in a caste from shoulder to finger tips. He told me I would be in the top 10% of fitters he had ever tested, that's tested not taught.
ALL the evidence at my hearing pointed to my old boss......he paid about 10 grand and was already retired when the chipshop exploded, I had warned about dodgy certs covering dodgy work for 6 years before the explosion, naming my old boss.....I lost my business, reputation, time with my kids and was forced to sell our family home, which we had just finished refurbishing.....my wife went to live in a caravan while I worked away to support her and my to young sons.
The Board hold on to one bullshit charge, which is explained away by a British standard.....42 out of 44 charges blown away at the hearing.
Share Topic
