sent to day to every single ministerDear Ministers,
I witnessed Mr Maurice Williams MP tirade on the Parliament channel last night and would like to make some comments on this Parliamentary speech made on behalf of this Bill to be amended, to allow the illegal gathering of nearly 2 million dollars from the plumbing and related trades.
I believe Mr Maurice Williams’ statement that….there are no sections available to the Board to prosecute unlicensed plumbers and gasfitters, I believe that 121 to 132 of the Plumbers Gasfitters and Drainlayers Act 2006, are available to the Board for these purposes, which covers offences and Infringement notices which are not used by the Board appointed by the Minister. A clear documented process for dealing with non registered people. I believe the amendment is more for the reason to get them out of trouble for a problem that they have known about for sometime.
His accusations that this legislation was passed by the Labour Government but he apparently forgot to mention National opposed a lot of the Bill at the time, so were aware of the problems and as soon as they got into Government didn’t apparently do anything to change it but simply implemented the Act in 2010, 4 years after the period he was referring to.
His mention of an explosion in a Nelson Pizza Hut, is very confusing and I think maybe unfounded. The only Pizza cooking related explosion I know of in my area of Nelson, is the one mentioned in the attached documents and emails below specifically certificate 345138 for a Pizza oven. My side of the story is available in my submission to the select committee on the Parliamentary website, under the name Paul Gee. I rang the local pizza hut in Nelson and the person who answered the phone said he knew nothing about an explosion, the only one he had heard of was , ironically, the one in Milton Street.
I ask all ministers to ask themselves if they want to get behind a bill in such a rushed manner, National ministers especially as you will be the ones remembered for implementing it. Please think of it in light of this reluctance to go after the real culprit in this only pizza cooking related explosion available to everyone I know in the industry, which the Board tried to be frame me for. All this is now known to the Minister Maurice Williamson. This man, my ex boss John Darnley, was also licensed, all be it by way of one oral exam carried out by the very same man that the Board saw fit to appoint as an impartial investigator, against my formal protests.
Who do you think the investigator should have gone after? I had complained about John Darnley for 6 years before, specifically for dodgy certs covering dodgy work. The last work was done by him at the site of this explosion and by the Boards own admission, see below, they knew he didn’t register the cert 345138 just 8 to 9 days after the explosion. John Darnley wasn’t even questioned about it.
The attached compliant, the whole basis for going after me, specifically mentions this cert 345138 and its discrepancies, it is totally in my old bosses name and all carbon and electronic copies show the GAS LEAK TEST RESULTS are empty at the site of an EXPLOSION. I have a 33 page report that goes toward dismissing the importance of this fundamental part of checking for gas leaks, issued by the Board
Mr Williamson dismissing the Federation as a small malcontent faction in the industry is not my experience. Every one I meet express concern but are too scared to raise their concerns because they believe they will be railroaded, and you can’t blame them when you know of my treatment. People are leaving the industry and sometimes the country hand over fist.
Mr Williamson appears to only listen to the Master Plumbers, who are part of the Board, having a 50% representation on the Board of the available places for the trades. Against it appears of the best recommendations for impartiality by the NZ Law Commission see below from a document available on
http://www.lawcom.govt.nz/sites/default/files/publications/2008/01/Publication_131_385_IP6_Tribunals_in_NZ.pdf -
5.36 A difficulty arises here in that occupational regulatory and disciplinary bodies are
often funded by the relevant industry, which may adversely affect perceptions of
their independence. However, this funding is necessary. We suggest that it may be
acceptable for these bodies to be funded through mechanisms such as licensing fees
and industry levies provided that they are independent from industry associations
and other purely industry groups, and that other mechanisms are in place to
safeguard their independence. For example, in its recent review of the Real Estate
Agents Act 1976, the Ministry of Justice suggested that the body responsible for
licensing and disciplinary matters ought to be “independent from the industry,”
meaning that the Real Estate Institute of New Zealand should not be able to exercise
control over it. This body would be constituted as a separate body that would be
required to report annually to Parliament. Finally, it was seen as important for
public perceptions of independence that the Minister of Justice should appoint
members, rather than the industry appointing the members.337 We note that these
recommendations arose in a context of public concern about the real estate industry.
However, we suggest that the underlying principles reflect a wider trend towards
greater independence for occupational bodies, and that the recommendations can
be considered as an example of best practice in any event.
I have some questions……
How did the exact information as the carbon copies for cert 345138 get on to the electronic register to enable an electronic cert to be made and with a matching cert number? If the Board never received the master copy, the electronic copy in all probability being on the site before the explosion.
Do you really want such a Board to be given even more power, remember every one at the Board in any power knew of it all then (or should have) and definitely do by now, but are in no hurry to investigate. Even the Minister Maurice Williamson says as things are he has no control over the direction of the Board. He is here for the Health and Safety for the Public, but no one has been held accountable for this near fatal explosion.
Do you want to be remembered by history for further empowering such apparent incompetence or even worse corruption?
Out of all the people involved in my situation, who do you think has the Health and safety of the public first and foremost in their mind?
Are you happy for an innocent person to be framed for something he tried to warn about, losing his home, business and reputation, having to work away from his family for the two years since the hearing? Just to protect an incompetent Board and the real culprit.
Yours Sincerely Paul Gee, please see below 2 emails from the Boards lawyer.
From: Melanie Phillips [mailto:melanie@pgdb.co.nz]
Sent: Wednesday, 11 May 2011 4:13 p.m.
To: Paul & Emma Gee
Cc: Wal Gordon
Subject: RE: Paul Gee
Hi Paul
Please see attached Belinda’s filenote of her request to John Darnley for a copy of certificate 345138. This occurred after she was contacted by lawyers acting for the owner on 17 April 2009 requesting copies of all gas certificates relating to 136 Milton Street.
Also attached is a copy of the certificate received which, as you will see, is of quite poor quality.
Please let me know if you need any more information.
Regards
Mel
From: Melanie Phillips[mailto:melanie@pgdb.co.nz]
Sent: Wednesday, 11 May 2011 3:22p.m.
To: Paul & Emma Gee; WalGordon
Subject: RE: Paul Gee
Hi Paul
I have just gone back through the fileand can confirm that the Board never received a pink copy of certificate345138. The only copy the Board has is a photocopy of the certifierscopy, which you produced as exhibit PG007 together with a copy of the gassuppliers copy.
I see notes from Belinda Greer on thefile that the Board copy of certificate 345138 was received after the explosionin 2009, I think from the Department of Labour.
I’m sorry I can’t help youfurther.
Regards
Mel
Paul Gee Plumbing & Gas Ltd
PO Box 249, Takaka 7142
0274 33 33 50 / 03 525 9889