You would have thought that the "new" Board would take the opportunity to clean house, fix the problems and prosecute the really guilty, but it appears that we got more of the same.

Here is the email I sent him this morning, I would ask anyone on this forum to do the same, read the transcripts above and make comment, I am at a loss as to how these blanket statements can be made.

I have asked Max Pederson for a similar feed back but have got nothing back


Hi Allan,

Please can you indicate, by page number of the transcript -

1.      Where I might find reference that supports your allegations below, in red, which were made in Saturdays Nelson Mail.

2.      Where I refer to myself as a “mere” plumber, especially when read in context.

3.      Also could I get a list of the “serious concerns”.

I am trying to organise my “retraining” and want to ensure that the Board approved course is relevant to my short comings. I have read and reread the transcript of the hearing and am finding difficulty locating either or evidence of such. As you can appreciate these allegations are having a huge effect on me, my family and reputation, and I ask for clarification in light of this. I do not think public blanket statements such as below are sufficient and think I am entitled to specifics, especially if I am to re educate my self. I have attached the transcript for your convenience.

Board chairman Alan Bickers said in a statement last night the board was concerned by Mr Gee's apparent lack of knowledge and appreciation of the applicable regulatory provisions for gasfitting.

"While the board understands that the disciplinary process can be stressful for parties, Mr Gee's evidence at the hearing raised serious concerns about his understanding of some fundamental aspects of the gasfitting trade."

Thank you,

Yours sincerely   Paul Gee

still nothing 16th nov

My point is Jax....  is that if you are prepared to make a public statement then you should back it up with information, all this information is public any way, the transcript is on here, I am only asking for page numbers.

You shouldn't be allowed to make vague public statements with out substance regardless of the situation, its just wrong ethically.

Looking forward to high court now.......