Right back since Jan 2003......the chip shop exploded in April 2009......

The 33 page report that Mr Smith refers to is the 33 page report that Max has talked about below, i.e. the only evidence that the Board received the cert (after they claimed it had never been received) was that it was entered on their system....


So Max, after denying you had ever received a copy of the exploding incomplete cert.... the only evidence that shows you received the cert.......is that you received the cert?


This is the logic in the 33 page report that DR Smith relies on in dismissing my case.....even though he is on record in 06 asking the Board to look into this situation.....three years before one of his constituents gets blown up.....


AND IT IS ME THATS GONE TOO FAR? Really?

Since Nick Smith wrote this letter, I have uncovered a huge amount of proof..... to prove his "fears" in this letter are founded, and still covered up until today.....but nothing has been done to fix this or clear my name.


You've all seen SOME of the proof.....what do you think?


He is in the best possible position to fix this, not just for me but for his constituents..... the very people who voted him in.


How does this bode for how we are treated or can expect to be treated? I believe it is just plain wrong.