I would ask:
1. Are the overseas trades people being bought into Chch having to go through the same licensing regime as NZ resident plumbers and gasfitters?
2. Why the Minister is protecting a Board that have crossed the line on so many occasions?
3. If the government is looking at alternative funding for the PGDB i.e. giving some of the gas levy to them so they can use it to prosecute unlicensed people undertaking plumbing, gasfitting or drainlaying?
4. Has the Minister till got faith in Mr Bickers given the recent Ombudsman Report, the loss of Charitable Status and the Board's bullheadedness in taking this decision to the high court, along with the RRC decision, the future RRC decisions and the comments by OAG in relation to the "offences fee" which is more akin to a levy?
5. Why are they so much in favour of cross seeding on Board's when it clearly is not working well?
6. What was Parliament's intentions when it required 2 plumbers, 2 gasfitters, 2 drainlayers, 2 people to advocate for consumers and 2 others to make up the PGDB?
7. Do they really understand that we are being forced to attend mundane courses which do not, in the majority of cases, add to the knowledge base of the industry in order to buy points? Really understand?
8. Do they think the Output agreement will stack up now?