Plumbers NZ is New Zealand's largest online plumbing, gas and drainage resource. Plumbing exam help, plumbing news, directory and free quotes.

Author Topic: PGDB theives  (Read 4315 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Thunderhead

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 341
  • Karma: +37/-3
PGDB theives
« on: March 31, 2011, 08:46:49 PM »
"We decided to hear from officials after concern was raised with us by the Minister for Building and Construction that the Plumbers, Gasfitters and Drainlayers Board might no longer be financially viable if the clauses relating to the disciplinary levy in the Plumbers, Gasfitters and Drainlayers Board (Fees) Notice 2010 were disallowed in the next few months"

Taken from wals last issue...

At the risk of sounding friken stupid...Is this an admission of guilt by the pgdb that they have been using our displinary fees to line there own fat pockets and illegially use those funds to fund other operations that have nothing to do with the displine of registered tradesmen?

And if so they should all be sacked...Because how the frick can they spout on about looking after the health and safety of the public when there corrupt!...and they cant even allocate the correct funds to the correct areas which should be childs play for people in there higher position...and they all knew what fees were ment for which operations...this just confirms there a gang of lying theives!

And if not then why delay the ruling because the actual functioning of the board is payed with from the rego fees, is it not? or is this fee also being pissed aghinst the wrong wall?

Ooh and a last question i was told at my suppliers today by the manager that the CPD courses for plumbing have been put on hold due to a standing court case aghinst them(PGDB)...has anyone out there heard anything about this?



Linkback: https://www.plumbers.nz/rant-or-rave/5/pgdb-theives/611/

Offline Jaxcat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1008
  • Karma: +40/-4
Re: PGDB theives
« Reply #1 on: April 01, 2011, 01:49:49 AM »
Your supplier is not quite right.  Wal Gordon and Allan Day from the PGD Federation took a complaint to the Regulations Review Committee around the disciplinary levy and the competency based licensing system and alleged that the PGDB had not followed the 2006 Act correctly and that it had, for want of better terminology, abused its powers in requiring the points based system as a condition of licensing.
The Regulation Review committee moved to disallow the regulation requiring points as a condition of licence.  It is now sitting before Parliament, and my understanding is that should there be no debate on it, then after 21 working days the disallowance goes through and the PGDB cannot demand that you have sufficient points as reason not to issue your licence.  In plain language - on or about the 8th or 9th of June the competency based licensing points system will cease to be legal.  It is highly unlikely that Parliament will debate the issue, and therefore highly likely that it will all go through.
The PGDB will then have to consult with industry around competencies and how they propose to ensure competency at licensing time each year.   You can check out the parliamentary website or see another thread on this forum to get the report.
Have you learned lessons only of those who admired you, and were tender with you, and stood aside for you?  Have you not learned great lessons from those who braced themselves against you, and disputed the passage with you?  (Walt Whitman 1819-1891)  American Poet

Offline Thunderhead

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 341
  • Karma: +37/-3
Re: PGDB theives
« Reply #2 on: April 01, 2011, 12:32:08 PM »
cheers for the  info jax much appreiated...

Offline jd24hrs

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 128
  • Karma: +3/-0
Re: PGDB theives
« Reply #3 on: May 18, 2011, 07:57:25 AM »
Stinking barstards

Offline robbo

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1259
  • Karma: +83/-7
Re: PGDB theives
« Reply #4 on: May 19, 2011, 08:33:17 AM »
hi guys, just looking at the pgdb "Strategic initiative 5" page 16 on their website. I don`t see anyware in it where they are going to REPAY disciplinary fees that have been overcharged over recent years, i think that they should do, what do you think? cheers 

Offline Jaxcat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1008
  • Karma: +40/-4
Re: PGDB theives
« Reply #5 on: May 19, 2011, 09:12:49 AM »
They have spent them, or they form part of the $2 million in reserves!

Offline robbo

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1259
  • Karma: +83/-7
Re: PGDB theives
« Reply #6 on: May 19, 2011, 12:15:43 PM »
hi guys, actually can they be called "fees" as the pgdb is a registered charity, i suppose they must be "donations". A good lawyer would argue that a person cannot forcibly made to make a donation therefore all forcibly obtained "donations" must be refunded,cheers

Offline Jaxcat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1008
  • Karma: +40/-4
Re: PGDB theives
« Reply #7 on: May 19, 2011, 12:22:03 PM »
Ah Robbo - there's the interesting thing.  Of course a complaint could be made to the Charities Commission and I am sure that the PGDB would be found to have broken the rules - given the RRC ruling.  But then what would happen - if the PGDB had to pay tax it is likely our fees would go up - so we would be hurting ourselves potentially.  A real quandry between right and right with consequences. 

The huge thing here is respect - I don't believe practitoners have a lot of respect for the PGDB - and here I am carefully separating out the entity of the "Board" as opposed to the staff who are tasked with actioning the "Board's" decisions.  The "Board" of 10 or so sit around a table make some pretty big decisions about how industry will be shaped.  For the first time ever with the advent of the PGD Federation - their decisions are coming under scrutiny - and I believe it is very necessary that there is a group looking at everything they do.

The spotlight will find many cobwebs I am sure - and we need to keep bringing these up and working on them.  It's hard enough out there at the moment for all of us. 


Offline Thunderhead

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 341
  • Karma: +37/-3
Re: PGDB theives
« Reply #8 on: May 19, 2011, 03:37:31 PM »
Na your right jax the people at the front line communications are not the ones to blame cus they like us are only trying to make a living and they have no control over those(The actual board members) that make these stinking stupid decisions. So when ever i talk to them i try to be nice as pie to them cus i reckon they dont deserve flack because they are only doing as told to do...So we have to make sure were pointing the effulent pipe in the right direction when we open up...hehehe

And your right not one single plumber i have ever spoken to has any form of respect for the Board...

Offline robbo

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1259
  • Karma: +83/-7
Re: PGDB theives
« Reply #9 on: May 19, 2011, 03:45:32 PM »
hi guys/jax, what you say is true and i agree but they do not pay tax so we have to go with what happens now. The board did not break the rules they made them, they broke the law which is very different and should be made to make amends. Respect! no we do not respect a board that has served us very badly and as a matter of interest i think the board hates all of us tradesmen and should be replaced with a board that works with us and not against us,cheers

Offline jd24hrs

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 128
  • Karma: +3/-0
Re: PGDB theives
« Reply #10 on: May 20, 2011, 06:07:08 AM »
Hi guys
Unfortunately while we idiots like Williamson and co past and present we don't stand a chance we need to start being in there faces and we need a list of the mps who think they vote against the plumbers of this country so we can start bombarding them with complaint about our troubles with the pgdb etc
Also it's about time we real plumbers told every body out that we are the real master plumbers because just cause you pay a fee to gravel and co this doesn't make you a master of shit it just means you payed a fee and people should only be judged by there last job which means you are only as good as your last job jd


Share via digg Share via facebook Share via linkedin Share via twitter

Similar Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies / Views Last post
xx
Get rid of the PGDB

Started by robbo

9 Replies
7429 Views
Last post October 22, 2009, 10:56:02 PM
by jd24hrs
question
Have a say. The PGDB needs to know!

Started by Plumber

79 Replies
35466 Views
Last post July 05, 2015, 11:09:33 AM
by Badger
xx
Help with PGDB

Started by johnny52

2 Replies
3597 Views
Last post November 19, 2010, 12:49:25 PM
by jd24hrs
xx
PGDB F*** OFF

Started by Badger

79 Replies
39031 Views
Last post March 22, 2013, 06:13:16 PM
by Rodza1
 
Share this topic...
In a forum
(BBCode)
In a site/blog
(HTML)