21
Fellow Practitioners Update / Re: Fellow Practitioner Issue 236 Dated 12 December 2014
« Last post by Badger on March 21, 2023, 08:21:26 AM ».
Sent this morning 21 March 23.
I believe that the reaction from the PGDB to this utter shambles reflects on what they think of every single one of you and the industry as a whole. If I was part of a PERPETUAL Industry Board and was expected to protect this kind of corruption I would be appalled, but then I have a moral compass and the balls to say so.
Paul Gee <pgee3366@gmail.com>
08:15 (0 minutes ago)
to Amanda, registrar, Chris, building, Emma, Wal, TVNZ, stuff.co.nz
Hi Amanda,
As I said this would be done with the disinfectant of daylight, out in the open and in public.
Please see below a link to the "Plumber's Forum", my Open Letter has been downloaded 80 times (at the time of writing this email), quite a small number nationally. But as it's a focused site, then I believe that the number is magnified by the lens of that trade specific site.
https://www.plumbers.nz/fellow-practitioners-update/41/fellow-practitioner-issue-236-dated-12-december-2014/1810/msg13271#msg13271
Please can you table this email along with my open letter to the PGDB. I do not want to ambush anyone (I have had it done to my family way too many times). I just want to emphasise that their reply will be posted in public before the industry.
How the PGDB reply will reflect how much they value their own integrity and how much they value what the industry thinks of them. Corruption doesn't have a "use by date".
How did Darnley face a charge for the explosion which magically disappeared by the time of his hearing...the separate hearing to my hearing, the one that had to be separate because we both faced the same charge at the start of the witch-hunt...which prevented my team from questioning him and his team. A very convenient co-incidence All done in good faith with reasonable care as per the Act???
Yours with Integrity Paul Gee.
Sent this morning 21 March 23.
I believe that the reaction from the PGDB to this utter shambles reflects on what they think of every single one of you and the industry as a whole. If I was part of a PERPETUAL Industry Board and was expected to protect this kind of corruption I would be appalled, but then I have a moral compass and the balls to say so.
Paul Gee <pgee3366@gmail.com>
08:15 (0 minutes ago)
to Amanda, registrar, Chris, building, Emma, Wal, TVNZ, stuff.co.nz
Hi Amanda,
As I said this would be done with the disinfectant of daylight, out in the open and in public.
Please see below a link to the "Plumber's Forum", my Open Letter has been downloaded 80 times (at the time of writing this email), quite a small number nationally. But as it's a focused site, then I believe that the number is magnified by the lens of that trade specific site.
https://www.plumbers.nz/fellow-practitioners-update/41/fellow-practitioner-issue-236-dated-12-december-2014/1810/msg13271#msg13271
Please can you table this email along with my open letter to the PGDB. I do not want to ambush anyone (I have had it done to my family way too many times). I just want to emphasise that their reply will be posted in public before the industry.
How the PGDB reply will reflect how much they value their own integrity and how much they value what the industry thinks of them. Corruption doesn't have a "use by date".
How did Darnley face a charge for the explosion which magically disappeared by the time of his hearing...the separate hearing to my hearing, the one that had to be separate because we both faced the same charge at the start of the witch-hunt...which prevented my team from questioning him and his team. A very convenient co-incidence All done in good faith with reasonable care as per the Act???
Yours with Integrity Paul Gee.