This PGD Board who Martin claims to have "dealt" with my case.....(since when was it "my" case?, think about it when did I get to own this case, surely it is the case of the Milton Street explosion eh?)....

So Martin ......This is the same Board who decided the best person to investigate was the same person who lobbied for self certification and gifted Darnley his license....you know Darnley who all the evidence points to....for the explosion....but the charge disappeared before his hearing.....f**** off mate, f**** right off....

Tony Hammond.....protecting the now failed cert system.....sorry Tony you didn't do a good job protecting your self certifying system, nor your reputation in granting Darnley his full ticket, your legacy is a total cluster-f**** up...hahahaha love that one........tool!!!!!!!


So Martin......is this Board you talk of, the same Board who thought Stephen Parker was the best guy to chair the hearing, with his mate as the investigator Tony Hammond as the impartial investigator......the same Parker who shut down the hearing as we were cross-examining Tony......for me to go 100% innocent......what a pair these are.....

Sorry Martin "my case" has NEVER been "dealt" with......ever....slanted, biased and set up yes definitely.....but never "dealt" with........with all due respect (zero).....f**** off.....


And when you consider that 95% of the charges are still go un-addressed, same as the explosion and the cert manipulation at Powick Street.........well do anyone think it has been dealt with?......do me a favour....

Or the central heating system that is going to kill....you know the stagnant water in the c/h rads, held there by TRV's that will open in winter and allow the water to be atomised through the shower.....this has never been dealt with......covered up yes , dealt with no.....

Or the loosing of gas certs by the PGDB (one at the site of an explosion) , the accepting of incomplete certs by the PGDB, the flippant issuing of certifying licenses to their mates by the PGDB....the accuracy disclaimer (LOL).........and it is US who need to show the card....where is their card?....f****in inept....

There are many many issues that go totally UN-DEALT with by the PGDB, the minister, nor the government......talk about full of shit..........their cups runneth over....


It is a joke......ON US..... hope you enjoy paying for those licenses.....where's their licenses??


.

Now as a little interlude to proceedings lets have a look at Marty, ten to two, Jackson and Graham, oh that's another fine mess you got me into Hardy....


An a couple of that fat mouthy Welsh Bastard.....me


If we ain't got humour, we got feck all......

I love this definition in an on-line dictionary, not a fancy Oxford one, but just a run of the mill online dictionary.
its about con-spir-a-cy.........
 

[kuh n-spir-uh-see]   

Spell Syllables

 Synonyms 
 Examples 
 Word Origin 

See more synonyms on Thesaurus.com




noun, plural conspiracies. 


1.

the act of conspiring.


2.

an evil, unlawful, treacherous, or surreptitious plan formulated in secret by two or more persons; plot.


3.

a combination of persons for a secret, unlawful, or evil purpose:
He joined the conspiracy to overthrow the government.


4.

Law. an agreement by two or more persons to commit a crime, fraud, or other wrongful act.


5.

any concurrence in action; combination in bringing about a given result.



Origin of conspiracy Expand







Middle English



Anglo-French


1325-1375
1325-75;  Middle English  conspiracie, probably < Anglo-French; see conspire, -acy; replacing Middle English  conspiracioun; see conspiration

Related forms Expand 


conspirative, adjective 

conspiratorial   
 [kuh n-spir-uh-tawr-ee-uh l, -tohr-]   (Show IPA), conspiratory, adjective 
conspiratorially, adverb 

nonconspiratorial, adjective 

preconspiracy, noun, plural preconspiracies. 


Synonyms Expand 

See more synonyms on Thesaurus.com



1. collusion, sedition. 2. Conspiracy,  plot,  intrigue,  cabal all refer to surreptitious or covert schemes to accomplish some end, most often an evil one. A conspiracy usually involves a group entering into a secret agreement to achieve some illicit or harmful objective: a vicious conspiracy to control prices.A plot is a carefully planned secret scheme, usually by a small number of persons, to secure sinister ends: a plot to seize control of a company.An intrigue usually involves duplicity and deceit aimed at achieving either personal advantage or criminal or treasonous objectives: the petty intrigues of civil servants. Cabal refers either to a plan by a small group of highly-placed persons to overthrow or control a government, or to the group of persons themselves: a cabal of powerful lawmakers.



Dictionary.com Unabridged
Based on the Random House Dictionary, © Random House, Inc. 2017.
Cite This Source

I got a theory about all of this..................






.

So Martin Sawyers CEO PGDB thinks that the people who over seen "my" case, not the case of the explosion, but mine.....well Martin thinks that the these conflicted people were "best placed to assess the information at the time"......

Really Martin you mean the Impartial investigator who was mates with the chair of the hearing......really those guys? Best placed?.......oh they were placed alright......positioned I would say.....

So Martin has the 42 charges been dealt with, because if I wasn't responsible who was......what's that Martin the PGDB don't know because they didn't pursue this.....really?

How about the explosion Martin, has that been dealt with, because as far as I know, no one has been held accountable and the guy who all the evidence points to faced a charge but it disappeared.....really?

How about the manipulation of certificates, a potential fraud, has that been dealt with Martin.....because the only time the PGDB contacted these people was in the un-true letter about me and then left the cylinders where they were....


Dealt with mate?.........

That smug boss-eyed Peter Jackson said to me when I approached him at a PGDB road-show about the sham of a hearing that I was subjected to.....

He said and I quote, "I don't see the problem you kept your license".......so "ten to two" it was just my business, reputation and home you wanted me to lose eh! What a giant smug twat, in my opinion.

I nearly said " just you look me straight in the eye and say that again"......but I thought it would take all night and I had work in the morning.....

I did nothing wrong, nothing.....but we lost our home, business and reputation, had my wife terrorised with child sexual abuse case notes and had to work away from home on and off since.....


My only mistake trying to warn that Darnley was doing dangerous work covered by dodgy certs.....for 6 years before an explosion.....which they tried to pin on me....missing and incomplete certificates covering an explosion....I could not have been more bang on the money, I could not have tailored my warning any better.......

What I didn't know was I was complaining to the very people who gifted Darnley his full certifying license...

These same people then appoint as the investigator the same person, Tony Hammond, who gifted Darnley his license.....to investigate for a hearing that was to be presided over by Tony Hammond's colleague Stephen Parker.......Stephen Parker calling a halt to the hearing just as we were going to go 100% innocent.....


Is this what Martin Sawyers means by "dealt with".......by the best people for the job.......please explain Martin.

Lets see if this system of ours is fair, if its open to all, if YOU can expect to rely on it for justice......lets see....