Apparently Martin in responsible for all the certs.......and now he knows (I have told him) they are a total cluster f**** of a mess, at least in my experience.....

So Mart......what are you going to do about it all......

I will ask you again why are you risking your reputation for the likes of these people.....I will personally help you clean up this mess.

You said once you were looking for people to come forward with problems and issues to help clean the industry up, well here I am sat up straight with my hand up waiting to be asked......

The sickening part about these dodgy, incomplete, inaccurate, scribbled on, twinked, signed blank, mismanaged SAFETY certs (all accepted by the PGDB) and flippantly issued full craftsman licenses, with at least one to a muppet who all the evidence points to in an explosion (as well as at least 9 others)......well all this has been done in peoples lives, their homes and businesses......


And the people charged with looking after this.....rather cover it up.....that is reprehensible.


Basically they would rather protect their reputations than do what they are there to do protecting the NZ public's safety......and we follow these people......really?

When you read the DOL complaint, it is full of weird certificate worries, concerns about the certificates.......

Now these certs are covering an explosion, cert 345138 was known by the PGDB in their own words to have had its carbon copies passed around but claim to have never received the pink original by the PGDB...they made this claim within days of the explosion to the chipshop owners lawyer (he was laying in a burns unit at the time).....

This is of course total and utter bollox because that very cert with the same number and cert details appears on their now defunct electronic register, you know the register that carries a disclaimer for accuracy.....then it got moved to ESS and became the "anyone can print off all you like and not register it anywhere" safety cert system......talk about a few hundred steps backwards....

This is the same cert that the investigator claims to have seen the original, see attached, but the PGDB claim to have never had it but it appears on their website, this is the same cert system that Hazel claims to have fully investigated......after the explosion......

In this same compliant it mentions a hose as the cause of the explosion but no one seems to think that a third hose sold many weeks after I left Allgas is of no concern, see receipt attached.....remember that this cert 345138, this hose are all mentioned in the only complaint, the only reason for the investigation in to me......




Now add to that I had warned for SIX years that there was dangerous work practices being covered by dodgy certs.........




Do you guys want to live under a system like that......because I can assure you it is still there and I can assure you that the Ombudsman doesn't give a giant flying Donald Duck.....see attached.


It is a cover up and any one who covers it up, is tainted by it all......it belittles everything they say about fair play, safety, integrity, the "trade".......when the powers that be do this.......you are frankly full of poo....


.

So they could find the electronic file straight away.....but couldn't get back to me by the 20 day deadline....because they got to "consult"....I wonder who with.......perhaps the PGDB could lend them their shredder.....

A month ago I received this....



On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 9:56 AM, Iona Cameron <xxx xxxx @worksafe.govt.nz> wrote:




Perfect, thanks Paul.  I have found the electronic file and I will also request the hard copy file from Nelson.  You’ll receive a reply to your OIA with 20 working days.

 

What did I tell you.......

All of these people know of my case......but do nothing.....I have emailed Jacinda about my case.....not even a reply....


If you needed no other proof than this…..

We are held in total and utter irreverence by these people.......they screw over who suits and ignore those with connections.....



What started out as a DIY brag got Labour's new deputy Jacinda Ardern in the poo after it turned out that it's illegal in some parts of the country to replace a toilet without an authorised plumber.

Ardern landed in hot water after Wellington plumber Justin Will complained over an article in which Ardern was asked about her proudest DIY moment.

Ardern name-checked her partner, broadcaster Clarke Gayford, for his good work replacing an old toilet during renovations of their home in Point Chevalier, Auckland.

That set in motion a formal complaint from Will to the Plumbers, Gasfitters and Drainlayers board, which was obliged to investigate.


But after Ardern apologised for her error, the board has told Will the case is closed.

Ardern accepted the work she carried out was sanitary plumbing work under the [Plumbers, Gasfitters and Drainlayers] Act and that it was unlawful for her to replace the toilet pan herself," chief executive Martin Sawyers wrote in a letter to Will.

"Due to the work being minor and of low risk, Ms Ardern's cooperation, acknowledgement and apology, the board will not be charging Ms Ardern with an offence under the Act but instead have issued her with a warning."

Ardern said she was not above the law and copped to the "crime" as soon as she was contacted.

"I do not blame them whatsoever...If someone raises an issue with them they are obliged to investigate. I absolutely respect that."
 


She didn't know who lodged the complaint but there were no hard feelings.

"It's no Watergate."

Its no Watergate…….what a smart arse reply, she is saying it is no big deal, a total dismissal of our trade and what we have to comply with after sitting an apprenticeship……can a time served registered plumber with three years experience carry out this work?..........




Well Martin……



Due to the work being minor and of low risk….the site of my last charge is of such a low risk that it is the same today as it was when it was installed and the PGDB have told subsequent people to “just close the window when you use it”, Ms Ardern's cooperation…………I have fully co-operated from day one and am actually mentioned in the complaint as coming forward on the day of the explosion………… acknowledgement and apology…….I acknowledge and apologise for the corrupt system that took my business ,reputation and home……..


One rule for us and one rule for them……..wake up.

Won't even get a reply......emailed this morning....Martin Sawyers copied in to......won't get a response from him either......


We are held in total and utter irreverence by these people.....




Hi Jacinda,

 

I have recently read about your brush with the PGDB.

 

Please take the time to read a submission I made to a Select committee. I have lost everything because of the corrupt and biased actions of the PGDB, the same people who said it was ok for you to change a toilet because you acknowledged and apologised for it.

 

I did absolutely nothing wrong whatsoever but lost everything, please can you let me know to whom you acknowledged and apologised to, so I can do the same and clear my name.

 

Yours with integrity Paul Gee.

Remember the Official Information Act requests I put in? Well its a joke.....





Martin,

With regards to the OIA I made on the 9th of Feb, I have received your letter of reply. Yet again I am disappointed by the PGDB as the OIA is incomplete.

I asked for ALL correspondence, that includes letters from the DOL as well, not just the PGDB's replies to those letters. It is even written as ALL correspondence in your reply.

I took correspondence as a mass noun, i.e.  Communication by exchanging letters. for example....

‘the organization engaged in detailed correspondence with local MPs’

As these are replies can I now get ALL the correspondence, it is a pretty basic request.

I note two things,

1. You have sent by snail mail against my request for email correspondence

2. John Darnley is mentioned a lot in these letters......how on Earth did his charge for the explosion disappear? Even when all the evidence points in his direction, this smacks of corruption to me......are you going to continue this cover up Martin? I thought more of you, I truly did.

With integrity Paul.


Paul Gee <plumbngas@gmail.com> 

Mar 14 (1 day ago)

to Martin, Wal

Martin,

Please can I get some sort of reply to this email below.

I do hope that you haven't replied by snail mail and I again formally request all the correspondence to me is by email.

To be clear I am after all communication, i.e. ALL the correspondence both outward and inward between the PGDB and the Dept of Labour with regards to the near fatal explosion at Milton Street Chip shop occurring in April 2009, the explosion I was framed for.


You Should note:

I have been trying to warn about dodgy certs covering dangerous work since 2002 (almost 15 years) and trying to clear my name since 2009 (soon to be 8 years)................I have not let up since and I never will.

You are now becoming the next part of the cover up, the opportunity of doing the right thing is passing.

I will force this issue until the next replacement incumbent addresses this (or the next one after that, add infinitum). One will even if it is years from now


What will your legacy be? Do you think those that you are covering for..... will cover for you when the shit hits the fan?.... and it will.... there is nothing surer.....

Please Martin I just want to clear my name, I have done nothing wrong. You can make a mark in the sand for truth and not cover up corruption.

Thank you

With Integrity Paul Gee

Paul Gee <plumbngas@gmail.com> 
 

4:37 PM (2 minutes ago)

to Martin, Wal

Martin,

The deadline for my OIA request has expired, I am entitled by law to some sort of reply.

Please can you tell me what is to happen, what will be your next action. The inaction to me speaks volumes. The Official Information act was implemented to out corruption.

Do I need to go through the façade of a complaint to the Ombudsman?

Yours With Integrity Paul

Just remember guys the Official Information Act was established to out corruption......


So when you get partial, "oo I didn't know you meant that" replies......its because they know it is corrupt.....dodgy feckers.....


You are running a business under this sort of crap.....I ain't going no where.....