Ok - I am speechless - what the hell does this have to do with a gas about gas certificates, exploding fish and chip shops, clearances etc?  I'm lost.  What is the context?

It nearly gave my wife a nervous break down, I swear on all that is holy if anything ever goes that far.....I will show them my distaste, it is so very ironic that the person they have terrorised the most, is the one keeping them safe.


Cowardly scum.....this needs airing, can you imagine Nick Smith telling me "on air" that its normal legal practice......the public back lash would give him whiplash.

Now add all this to the bullshit below.....do we need/want/deserve this kind of shit?


Which side are you going to pick......they are utter scum.

If your new to the forum, please take the time to read the posts on here, there is a lot, but there is a lot that we deal with.


Max Pederson Plumbers Board CEO, what is happening with the legionnaires risk that you have ignored for years, are you going to wait until someone falls ill.

if your an old hand to this forum share it on face book, share it around, print it off and put it in the smoko room, but please do use discretion with the sick and twisted case notes, they are twisted and should be only shown to consenting adults who are aware of the content, unlike my wife who had them sent to us unmarked.

It gets better, here is my reply received last night, now I am more convinced than before, sometimes you answer by not answering, and the more flannel just shows your hiding something......apparently it isn't reasonable to ask someone you have worked closely with for years whether it is them in a photo, ever more flannel......here is an idea Mr Pedersen ASK Mr Jackson if its him in the photo. It is that easy.

And as Mr Pedersen has never met Mr Darnley??? perhaps he could ask the investigator, Mr Hammond, the chair of my hearing Mr Parker, or the other Board member's in the photo, what Mr Darnley looks like, he is the one circled.....is this a reasonable answer?

Now I asked the Board to show where I had "varied" on making my point in  my complaints about this hot water system (I can find no variations???, but this would help to undermine me yet again, bit like when they said I called myself a mere plumber, but can't show me where I said it). please if you can find any variations let me know.

...... but they have sent a full comprehensive list of when and how I have tried to get them look at a legionnaire's risk(its a big list), even the time I contacted the coroner, they mention twice contacting the local TA and that I would be informed of the result, still waiting to hear about this, as well as a pink copy of the cert for this place, you've seen how it is potentially plumbed, and according to the Board they have no letters (so they have sent no letters) to Darnley to inform him of these complaints, which they are meant to send on receiving a complaint, unless the complaint is dismissed as vexatious or frivolous, or even lately unreasonable, so it appears that they don't adhere to their own policies....should they adhere to their own policies??? wouldn't you want to get this potentially dangerous system looked at? Is this reasonable?

So here's a quote from a news paper, attributable to Mr Pedersen...


“Don’t risk your family’s health and safety or your insurance by hiring unauthorised people. Any defective sanitary plumbing work has the potential to cause disease and serious, costly damage to the home.”

Now read the correspondence below in the attachments and ask your self why doesn't this quote apply to this address.

Wouldn't you just send someone to check if what I am saying is true or untrue, wouldn't it be reasonable to make sure that this address is safe? Instead of palming it off to others?